Effectiveness of adjusting radiographic technique parameters on image quality in direct digital radiography: a systematic review protocol.

Caitlin Steffensen, Gregory Trypis, Gordon T W Mander, Zachary Munn
{"title":"Effectiveness of adjusting radiographic technique parameters on image quality in direct digital radiography: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Caitlin Steffensen, Gregory Trypis, Gordon T W Mander, Zachary Munn","doi":"10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this review is to investigate the effectiveness of adjusting radiographic technique parameters on image quality of projectional radiographs acquired on a direct digital radiography system.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Projectional radiography performed with direct digital detectors is now commonplace in many medical imaging departments across the world. While the acquisition technology has advanced, it appears that many sites have not optimized their radiographic technique factors for this new technology. The aim of this review is to uncover evidence to support the continued use of these traditional technique parameters or to suggest changes in clinical practice that would produce optimized results.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>The review will consider studies that include projectional radiographs acquired on a direct digital radiography system of the axial and appendicular skeleton. Only studies that investigate a human subject (living or post-mortem), or an anthropomorphic phantom will be included. Studies that directly investigate the effect of changing a technique parameter on the resultant image quality and the effect on patient dose will be included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of both published and unpublished literature will be performed to uncover studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Studies will be screened for inclusion by two reviewers and disagreements resolved through discussion or with a third reviewer. Studies included in final analysis will be critically appraised for methodological quality. Data will be extracted by a single reviewer and checked by the author team for accuracy. Statistical meta-analysis and subgroup analyses will be performed as appropriate, and a Summary of Findings created.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration number: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42019137806.</p>","PeriodicalId":73539,"journal":{"name":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","volume":"17 10","pages":"2165-2173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this review is to investigate the effectiveness of adjusting radiographic technique parameters on image quality of projectional radiographs acquired on a direct digital radiography system.

Introduction: Projectional radiography performed with direct digital detectors is now commonplace in many medical imaging departments across the world. While the acquisition technology has advanced, it appears that many sites have not optimized their radiographic technique factors for this new technology. The aim of this review is to uncover evidence to support the continued use of these traditional technique parameters or to suggest changes in clinical practice that would produce optimized results.

Inclusion criteria: The review will consider studies that include projectional radiographs acquired on a direct digital radiography system of the axial and appendicular skeleton. Only studies that investigate a human subject (living or post-mortem), or an anthropomorphic phantom will be included. Studies that directly investigate the effect of changing a technique parameter on the resultant image quality and the effect on patient dose will be included.

Methods: A comprehensive search of both published and unpublished literature will be performed to uncover studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Studies will be screened for inclusion by two reviewers and disagreements resolved through discussion or with a third reviewer. Studies included in final analysis will be critically appraised for methodological quality. Data will be extracted by a single reviewer and checked by the author team for accuracy. Statistical meta-analysis and subgroup analyses will be performed as appropriate, and a Summary of Findings created.

Systematic review registration number: PROSPERO CRD42019137806.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调整射线照相技术参数对直接数字射线照相图像质量的有效性:一个系统的评价方案。
目的:本综述的目的是研究调整射线照相技术参数对直接数字射线照相系统上获得的投影射线照片图像质量的有效性。简介:使用直接数字探测器进行的投影射线照相术现在在世界各地的许多医学成像部门都很常见。虽然采集技术已经进步,但似乎许多站点没有针对这项新技术优化其射线照相技术因素。本综述的目的是揭示支持继续使用这些传统技术参数的证据,或建议临床实践中的变化,以产生最佳结果。纳入标准:该综述将考虑包括在轴向和附件骨骼的直接数字射线照相系统上获得的投影射线照片的研究。只有研究人类受试者(活体或死后)或拟人化幻影的研究才会被包括在内。将包括直接研究改变技术参数对结果图像质量的影响以及对患者剂量的影响的研究。方法:将对已发表和未发表的文献进行全面检索,以发现符合纳入标准的研究。研究将由两名评审员进行筛选,并通过讨论或与第三名评审员解决分歧。纳入最终分析的研究将对方法论质量进行严格评估。数据将由一名审查人员提取,并由作者团队进行准确性检查。将酌情进行统计荟萃分析和亚组分析,并创建调查结果摘要。系统评审注册号:PROSPERO CRD42019137806。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Approaches to implementing individual placement and support in the health and welfare sectors: a scoping review protocol. Retention of doctors in emergency medicine: a scoping review protocol. Evaluations of health care delivery models in Australia: a scoping review protocol. Meaningful and culturally appropriate palliative care for Chinese immigrants with a terminal condition: a qualitative systematic review protocol. Experiences of outdoor nature-based therapeutic recreation programs for persons with a mental illness: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1