Barriers to Counseling on Advance Directives Based on Counselors' Experiences: Focus Group Interviews.

Yejin Kim, W, Shin Hye Yoo, Wonho Choi, Min Sun Kim, Hye Yoon Park, Bhumsuk Keam
{"title":"Barriers to Counseling on Advance Directives Based on Counselors' Experiences: Focus Group Interviews.","authors":"Yejin Kim,&nbsp;W,&nbsp;Shin Hye Yoo,&nbsp;Wonho Choi,&nbsp;Min Sun Kim,&nbsp;Hye Yoon Park,&nbsp;Bhumsuk Keam","doi":"10.14475/kjhpc.2020.23.3.126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In Korea, since the Act on Hospice and Palliative Care and Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment for Patients at the End of Life was implemented in February 2018, advance directives (ADs) have become legally effective and should be documented after sufficient explanation by a registered counselor. However, little is known regarding the adequacy of current AD counseling. This qualitative study aimed to explore the barriers to AD counseling based on counselors' experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted focus group interviews using purposive sampling. Seven counselors working at hospitals, community health institutions, and non-profit organizations participated in this study. They were asked about the challenges and problems they encountered during AD counseling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three themes emerged from this study; 1) issues regarding consistency in AD counseling, 2) issues regarding AD counselors' competency and work environment, and 3) issues regarding the adequacy of the service system. The interviewees stated that the lack of a manual for standardized service made AD counseling inconsistent. The limited competency and poor work environment of counselors were pointed out as major barriers. The interviewees also stated that a proper service system considering individual circumstances is absent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The goals of AD counseling should be clarified and guidance should be implemented for providing standardized services. Further efforts to enhance the competency of AD counselors and to improve their working conditions are needed. Establishing an integrated framework for an adequate service system is also essential to overcome systematic barriers to AD counseling.</p>","PeriodicalId":73194,"journal":{"name":"Han'guk Hosup'isu Wanhwa Uiryo Hakhoe chi = The Korean journal of hospice and palliative care","volume":"23 3","pages":"126-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/16/65/KJHPC-23-126.PMC10332722.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Han'guk Hosup'isu Wanhwa Uiryo Hakhoe chi = The Korean journal of hospice and palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14475/kjhpc.2020.23.3.126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In Korea, since the Act on Hospice and Palliative Care and Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment for Patients at the End of Life was implemented in February 2018, advance directives (ADs) have become legally effective and should be documented after sufficient explanation by a registered counselor. However, little is known regarding the adequacy of current AD counseling. This qualitative study aimed to explore the barriers to AD counseling based on counselors' experiences.

Methods: We conducted focus group interviews using purposive sampling. Seven counselors working at hospitals, community health institutions, and non-profit organizations participated in this study. They were asked about the challenges and problems they encountered during AD counseling.

Results: Three themes emerged from this study; 1) issues regarding consistency in AD counseling, 2) issues regarding AD counselors' competency and work environment, and 3) issues regarding the adequacy of the service system. The interviewees stated that the lack of a manual for standardized service made AD counseling inconsistent. The limited competency and poor work environment of counselors were pointed out as major barriers. The interviewees also stated that a proper service system considering individual circumstances is absent.

Conclusion: The goals of AD counseling should be clarified and guidance should be implemented for providing standardized services. Further efforts to enhance the competency of AD counselors and to improve their working conditions are needed. Establishing an integrated framework for an adequate service system is also essential to overcome systematic barriers to AD counseling.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于咨询师经验的预先指示咨询障碍:焦点小组访谈。
目的:在韩国,自2018年2月实施《临终关怀和缓和疗护法》和《临终病人维持生命治疗决定法》以来,预先指示(ad)已具有法律效力,应在注册咨询师进行充分解释后记录在案。然而,目前人们对AD咨询的充分性知之甚少。本质性研究旨在根据咨询师的经验,探讨AD咨询的障碍。方法:采用有目的抽样法进行焦点小组访谈。在医院、社区卫生机构和非营利组织工作的7名咨询师参与了本研究。他们被问及在AD咨询期间遇到的挑战和问题。结果:本研究出现了三个主题;1) AD咨询的一致性问题,2)AD咨询师的能力和工作环境问题,3)服务体系的充分性问题。受访者表示,缺乏标准化服务手册使AD咨询不一致。辅导员的能力有限和工作环境不佳是主要障碍。受访者还表示,没有考虑到个人情况的适当服务体系。结论:应明确AD咨询的目标,实施指导,提供规范化服务。需要进一步努力提高AD辅导员的能力并改善他们的工作条件。为适当的服务体系建立一个综合框架也是克服AD咨询系统障碍的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health Personnel's Knowledge, Attitudes, and Self-Efficacy Related to Providing Palliative Care in Persons with Chronic Diseases. Relationships among Perceptions of Dying Well, Attitudes toward Advance Directives, and Preferences for Advance Directives among Elderly Living Alone. Attitudes towards Death, Perceptions of Hospice Care, and Hospice Care Needs among Family Members of Patients in the Intensive Care Unit. The Art Therapy Experiences of Patients and Their Family Members in Hospice Palliative Care. Barriers to Early Palliative Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1