Effects of the discharge plan on the caregiving load of people with chronic disease: Quasi-experimental study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Chronic Illness Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-03 DOI:10.1177/17423953231192131
Gloria Carvajal Carrascal, Alejandra Fuentes Ramírez, Sandra Patricia Pulido Barragán, Maryory Guevara Lozano, Beatriz Sánchez-Herrera
{"title":"Effects of the discharge plan on the caregiving load of people with chronic disease: Quasi-experimental study.","authors":"Gloria Carvajal Carrascal, Alejandra Fuentes Ramírez, Sandra Patricia Pulido Barragán, Maryory Guevara Lozano, Beatriz Sánchez-Herrera","doi":"10.1177/17423953231192131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the effect of an anticipated care plan, structured around hospital discharge (PC-AH-US), regarding the caregiving load of people with NTCD residing in Colombia, 2019-2021.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This is a quasi-experimental study with pre- and post-intervention measurements. It includes 1170 participants who represented 585 chronic disease patient-caregiver pairs. We compared the PC-AH-US intervention, to the regular intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PC-AH-US intervention group showed better results in all dimensions when compared to the regular intervention group: Awareness 8.7 (SD: 0.7) and 6.8 (SD: 1.7); Acknowledgement of their unique conditions 11.3 (SD: 1.0) and 9.4 (SD: 1.8); Capacity to fulfill care tasks 8.8 (SD: 0.7) and 7.5 (SD: 1.5); Wellbeing 11.4 (SD: 0.90) and 8.87 (SD: 2.3); Anticipation 5.88 (SD: 0.4) and 4.7 (SD: 1.1) and Support Network 11.4 (SD: 0.8) and 9.9 (SD: 2.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PC-AH-US intervention group showed a statistically significant decrease in the caregiving load for people with NTCD (<i>p</i> < 00). There were no significant institutional differences in readmissions or deaths. The PC-AH-US intervention backs institutional policies meant to care for people with NTCD.</p>","PeriodicalId":48530,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Illness","volume":" ","pages":"712-723"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622529/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Illness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17423953231192131","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effect of an anticipated care plan, structured around hospital discharge (PC-AH-US), regarding the caregiving load of people with NTCD residing in Colombia, 2019-2021.

Method: This is a quasi-experimental study with pre- and post-intervention measurements. It includes 1170 participants who represented 585 chronic disease patient-caregiver pairs. We compared the PC-AH-US intervention, to the regular intervention.

Results: The PC-AH-US intervention group showed better results in all dimensions when compared to the regular intervention group: Awareness 8.7 (SD: 0.7) and 6.8 (SD: 1.7); Acknowledgement of their unique conditions 11.3 (SD: 1.0) and 9.4 (SD: 1.8); Capacity to fulfill care tasks 8.8 (SD: 0.7) and 7.5 (SD: 1.5); Wellbeing 11.4 (SD: 0.90) and 8.87 (SD: 2.3); Anticipation 5.88 (SD: 0.4) and 4.7 (SD: 1.1) and Support Network 11.4 (SD: 0.8) and 9.9 (SD: 2.5).

Conclusion: The PC-AH-US intervention group showed a statistically significant decrease in the caregiving load for people with NTCD (p < 00). There were no significant institutional differences in readmissions or deaths. The PC-AH-US intervention backs institutional policies meant to care for people with NTCD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
出院计划对慢性病患者护理负荷的影响:准实验研究。
目的:确定围绕出院(PC-AH-US)构建的预期护理计划对2019-2021年居住在哥伦比亚的非传染性疾病患者护理负荷的影响。方法:这是一项准实验研究,包括干预前和干预后的测量。它包括1170名参与者,他们代表了585对慢性病患者-护理者。我们比较了PC-AH-US干预和常规干预。结果:PC-AH-US干预组各维度均优于常规干预组:意识8.7 (SD: 0.7)、6.8 (SD: 1.7);确认其独特条件11.3 (SD: 1.0)及9.4 (SD: 1.8);完成护理任务的能力为8.8 (SD: 0.7)和7.5 (SD: 1.5);幸福感11.4 (SD: 0.90)和8.87 (SD: 2.3);预期5.88 (SD: 0.4)和4.7 (SD: 1.1),支持网络11.4 (SD: 0.8)和9.9 (SD: 2.5)。结论:PC-AH-US干预组对非传染性疾病患者的护理负担有显著的降低(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chronic Illness
Chronic Illness Multiple-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Chronic illnesses are prolonged, do not resolve spontaneously, and are rarely completely cured. The most common are cardiovascular diseases (hypertension, coronary artery disease, stroke and heart failure), the arthritides, asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes and epilepsy. There is increasing evidence that mental illnesses such as depression are best understood as chronic health problems. HIV/AIDS has become a chronic condition in those countries where effective medication is available.
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of a broadly applicable instrument to measure patients' health promotion and empowerment process in chronic disease. Personal variation in patient-centered relevance Index based on individual characteristics and medical conditions among patients with diabetes Mellitus in Korea. Relationship between parent-adolescent communication and parent involvement in adolescent Type 1 diabetes management, parent/family wellbeing and glycaemic control. Patients' perception towards chronic disease self-management and its program: A cross-sectional survey. Effectiveness of peer mentoring and self-monitoring to improve blood pressure control in a vulnerable population in Argentina: Pragmatic randomized open-label controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1