The potential of digital health records for public health research, policy, and practice: the case of the Lombardy Region Data Warehouse.

Lorenzo Blandi, Alessandro Amorosi, Olivia Leoni, Timo Clemens, Helmut Brand, Anna Odone
{"title":"The potential of digital health records for public health research, policy, and practice: the case of the Lombardy Region Data Warehouse.","authors":"Lorenzo Blandi,&nbsp;Alessandro Amorosi,&nbsp;Olivia Leoni,&nbsp;Timo Clemens,&nbsp;Helmut Brand,&nbsp;Anna Odone","doi":"10.23750/abm.v94iS3.14407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Digital health records can provide advantages to healthcare practice, policy, and research. Several countries have established population-based digitalised data collection, integrated through data linkage techniques. In Lombardy (Italy), a regional population-based registry was established in the 2000s. It collects data from the social and health sector, anonymised immediately after their acquisition and restructured in a single repository. Data can be used for public health interest, planning, monitoring, services evaluation, and research. Indeed, data can also be provided to universities and other scientific institutes. The availability of such data enables to explore the epidemiology of infectious, chronic, and rare diseases. Thus, epidemiological research can support policymakers to tackle public health threats. However, analysis of electronic health records comes along with several challenges, including data inaccuracy, incompleteness, and biases. Researchers should take into consideration limits and barriers related to quality of data. Moreover, health data use must adhere to the national and European privacy legislation, at times limiting the potential of data integration. Therefore, even if big data drives innovation and scientific knowledge, ethical issues regarding privacy should be considered in public debate.</p>","PeriodicalId":35682,"journal":{"name":"Acta Biomedica de l''Ateneo Parmense","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Biomedica de l''Ateneo Parmense","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v94iS3.14407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital health records can provide advantages to healthcare practice, policy, and research. Several countries have established population-based digitalised data collection, integrated through data linkage techniques. In Lombardy (Italy), a regional population-based registry was established in the 2000s. It collects data from the social and health sector, anonymised immediately after their acquisition and restructured in a single repository. Data can be used for public health interest, planning, monitoring, services evaluation, and research. Indeed, data can also be provided to universities and other scientific institutes. The availability of such data enables to explore the epidemiology of infectious, chronic, and rare diseases. Thus, epidemiological research can support policymakers to tackle public health threats. However, analysis of electronic health records comes along with several challenges, including data inaccuracy, incompleteness, and biases. Researchers should take into consideration limits and barriers related to quality of data. Moreover, health data use must adhere to the national and European privacy legislation, at times limiting the potential of data integration. Therefore, even if big data drives innovation and scientific knowledge, ethical issues regarding privacy should be considered in public debate.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字健康记录在公共卫生研究、政策和实践中的潜力:以伦巴第大区数据仓库为例。
数字健康记录可以为医疗实践、政策和研究提供优势。一些国家已经建立了基于人口的数字化数据收集,并通过数据链接技术进行整合。在伦巴第(意大利),2000年代建立了一个基于人口的区域登记处。它从社会和卫生部门收集数据,在收购后立即匿名,并在一个单一的存储库中进行重组。数据可用于公共卫生利益、规划、监测、服务评估和研究。事实上,数据也可以提供给大学和其他科学机构。这些数据的可用性使我们能够探索传染病、慢性病和罕见病的流行病学。因此,流行病学研究可以支持决策者应对公共卫生威胁。然而,电子健康记录的分析也带来了一些挑战,包括数据不准确、不完整和偏见。研究人员应该考虑到与数据质量相关的限制和障碍。此外,健康数据的使用必须遵守国家和欧洲的隐私立法,有时会限制数据整合的潜力。因此,即使大数据推动了创新和科学知识,在公开辩论中也应该考虑有关隐私的伦理问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Biomedica de l''Ateneo Parmense
Acta Biomedica de l''Ateneo Parmense Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Acta Bio Medica Atenei Parmensis is the official Journal of the Society of Medicine and Natural Sciences of Parma, and it is one of the few Italian Journals to be included in many excellent scientific data banks (i.e. MEDLINE). Acta Bio Medica was founded in 1887 and its founders and collaborators, Clinicians and Surgeons, entered history. Acta Bio Medica Atenei Parmensis publishes Original Articles, Commentaries, Review Articles, Case Reports of experimental and general Medicine. A section is devoted to a Continuous Medical Education programme in order to help primary care Physicians to improve the quality of care.
期刊最新文献
Covid-19 emergency management and preparedness in cross-border territories. Collection of experiences, needs and public health strategies in the framework of interreg GESTI.S.CO. project. Built environment impact on people with dementia (PwD) health and well-being outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. Rolling e-learning: an educational model to support Italian healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Evaluation of stakeholder opinion about Long Term Care Facilities for People with Dementia perceived quality: a web-based survey in the Italian context. HB-HTA focus in a tertiary hospitals' network in Northern Italy: A three-years experience analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1