Conclusions et ouverture : dialogue intergénérationnel.

Marie Glinel
{"title":"Conclusions et ouverture : dialogue intergénérationnel.","authors":"Marie Glinel","doi":"10.54695/jibes.342.0243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the bioethics law has just been voted, several actors during this academic conference have examined the paradigm shift introduced by this resolutely liberal law from their respective perspectives. Using a reading grid inherited from Pascal&#8217;s orders, the different dimensions of moral, political, legal, and scientific discourse are used as a reference to evaluate an often highly contrasting discourse. The evolution of the paradigm from bioethics law to zoethics law, in search of social legitimacy and of a response to individual desires, constitutes a turning point in the revision of bioethics laws. Under these conditions, does bioethics law does not lose its universal purpose?</p>","PeriodicalId":73577,"journal":{"name":"Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54695/jibes.342.0243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the bioethics law has just been voted, several actors during this academic conference have examined the paradigm shift introduced by this resolutely liberal law from their respective perspectives. Using a reading grid inherited from Pascal’s orders, the different dimensions of moral, political, legal, and scientific discourse are used as a reference to evaluate an often highly contrasting discourse. The evolution of the paradigm from bioethics law to zoethics law, in search of social legitimacy and of a response to individual desires, constitutes a turning point in the revision of bioethics laws. Under these conditions, does bioethics law does not lose its universal purpose?

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结论和建议:与其他人员对话。
由于生物伦理法刚刚被投票通过,这次学术会议上的几位参与者从他们各自的角度审视了这一坚决自由的法律所带来的范式转变。使用继承自pascal的阅读网格,道德、政治、法律和科学话语的不同维度被用作评价经常高度对比的话语的参考。从生命伦理学法到动物伦理学法的范式演变,寻求社会合法性和对个人欲望的回应,构成了生命伦理学法修订的转折点。在这种情况下,生命伦理学法是否失去了它的普遍目的?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
C. Castets-Renard, J. Eynard, Un droit de l’intelligence artificielle, Bruylant, Bruxelles, 2023. Centre de recherche de l’Académie militaire de Saint-Cyr Coëtquidan et la Croix-Rouge française, Les enjeux de l’autonomie des systèmes d’armes létaux, Pédone, Paris, 2022. Chapitre 1. Essais cliniques et bioéthique en Inde. Chapitre 2. L’autonomisation des comités nationaux d’éthique de la recherche en Afrique : perspective historique et enjeux actuels. Chapitre 3. Inégalités dans le dépistage et la prévention du VIH/SIDA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1