Long-term results and predictors of failure after mechanochemical endovenous ablation in the treatment of primary great saphenous vein incompetence.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Phlebology Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-15 DOI:10.1177/02683555231202181
Marianne E Witte, Suzanne Holewijn, Daphne van der Veen, Michel Mpj Reijnen, Clark J Zeebregts
{"title":"Long-term results and predictors of failure after mechanochemical endovenous ablation in the treatment of primary great saphenous vein incompetence.","authors":"Marianne E Witte, Suzanne Holewijn, Daphne van der Veen, Michel Mpj Reijnen, Clark J Zeebregts","doi":"10.1177/02683555231202181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mechanochemical endovenous ablation (MOCA) was introduced to treat superficial venous insufficiency of the lower leg with less pain and haematoma. Long-term outcome is still lacking. The purpose was to report long-term outcome and to analyse possible predictors for failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was a retrospective pooled analysis of two prospective cohorts previously reported, but with prolonged long-term outcome up to 5-years follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>163 treated legs were analysed. Mean follow-up was 5.4±0.6 years, in which 33 total failures occurred. Four procedures were partially successful. VCSS improved significantly and remained stable after 1 and 2-years, but significantly rose again after 5-years. AVVQ dropped significantly, but increased after 1 year to 4.3 and 6.1 at 5-years follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MOCA was effective with minimal pain perioperative. However, anatomical success deteriorated after 1-year and showed even less results after 5-years, mainly due to partly recanalization, while clinical results were less affected. There were no clear clinical predictors for failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":20139,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":" ","pages":"9-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555231202181","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mechanochemical endovenous ablation (MOCA) was introduced to treat superficial venous insufficiency of the lower leg with less pain and haematoma. Long-term outcome is still lacking. The purpose was to report long-term outcome and to analyse possible predictors for failure.

Methods: The study was a retrospective pooled analysis of two prospective cohorts previously reported, but with prolonged long-term outcome up to 5-years follow-up.

Results: 163 treated legs were analysed. Mean follow-up was 5.4±0.6 years, in which 33 total failures occurred. Four procedures were partially successful. VCSS improved significantly and remained stable after 1 and 2-years, but significantly rose again after 5-years. AVVQ dropped significantly, but increased after 1 year to 4.3 and 6.1 at 5-years follow-up.

Conclusion: MOCA was effective with minimal pain perioperative. However, anatomical success deteriorated after 1-year and showed even less results after 5-years, mainly due to partly recanalization, while clinical results were less affected. There were no clear clinical predictors for failure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗原发性大隐静脉瓣膜功能不全的机械化学静脉腔内消融术的长期效果和失败预测因素。
背景:机械化学静脉腔内消融术(MOCA)用于治疗小腿浅静脉功能不全,可减少疼痛和血肿。但目前仍缺乏长期疗效。本研究旨在报告长期疗效并分析可能的失败预测因素:该研究是对之前报告的两个前瞻性队列的回顾性汇总分析,但长期结果延长至 5 年随访:结果:共分析了 163 条接受治疗的腿。平均随访时间为(5.4±0.6)年,共有33例失败。4例手术部分成功。VCSS明显改善,并在1年和2年后保持稳定,但在5年后又明显上升。AVVQ明显下降,但1年后增至4.3,5年随访时增至6.1:结论:MOCA 手术效果显著,围手术期疼痛极小。结论:MOCA 效果显著,围手术期疼痛轻微,但解剖学成功率在 1 年后有所下降,5 年后效果更差,主要原因是部分再通畅,而临床效果受到的影响较小。临床上没有明确的失败预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Phlebology
Phlebology 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
11.80%
发文量
84
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The leading scientific journal devoted entirely to venous disease, Phlebology is the official journal of several international societies devoted to the subject. It publishes the results of high quality studies and reviews on any factor that may influence the outcome of patients with venous disease. This journal provides authoritative information about all aspects of diseases of the veins including up to the minute reviews, original articles, and short reports on the latest treatment procedures and patient outcomes to help medical practitioners, allied health professionals and scientists stay up-to-date on developments. Print ISSN: 0268-3555
期刊最新文献
Implementation of a varicose vein module added to Swedvasc, the Swedish National Registry for vascular surgery. Long-term results and predictors of failure after mechanochemical endovenous ablation in the treatment of primary great saphenous vein incompetence. Durability and efficacy of the ELVeS® Radial® 2ring slim fiber for multiple ablations. Punch grafting for the treatment of ulcerated atrophie blanche. Pigmentation of lower limbs: Contribution of haemosiderin and melanin in chronic venous insufficiency and related disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1