Comparison of the free thinned anterolateral thigh perforator flap with the free medial sural artery perforator flap for reconstruction of head and neck, and extremity defects.

Abstract

BACKGROUNDThe free anterolateral thigh (ALTP) and free medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flaps are time tested donor for head and neck, and extremities defect reconstruction. Proponents of either flap have concluded each as workhorse flap in their large cohort studies. However, we could not find any literature comparing the donor morbidities, or recipient site outcomes of these flaps, objectively.METHODSRetrospective data, such as demographic details, flap characteristics and post operative course, from patients who underwent free thinned ALTP (25 patients) and MSAP flap (20 patients) were included. At follow-up, donor site morbidity and recipient site outcomes were assessed, using previously defined protocols. These were compared in-between the two groups. RESULTSFree thinned ALTP (tALTP) flap had significantly more pedicle length and vessel diameter and harvest time than free MSAP flap (p value<.00). The differences in incidence of hyperpigmentation, itching, hypertrophic scar, numbness, sensory impairment and cold intolerance at the donor site in-between the two groups, were not significant statistically. Scar at free MSAP donor site was considered a significant social stigma (p value=.005). Recipient site cosmetic outcome was comparable (p value=.86), measured using aesthetic numeric analogue.CONCLUSIONSThe free tALTP flap is superior to free MSAP flap in terms of pedicle length, vessel diameter, donor site morbidity, while the latter takes lesser time for harvest.