Early and late outcomes of patients treated with hybrid sirolimus-eluting stent or everolimus-eluting stent

Cristiano de Oliveira Cardoso, Clacir Staudt, Aldo Fernando Somavilla Duarte, La Hore Correa Rodrigues, Cristiane Cauduro Lima, Vasco Morosini Miller
{"title":"Early and late outcomes of patients treated with hybrid sirolimus-eluting stent or everolimus-eluting stent","authors":"Cristiano de Oliveira Cardoso,&nbsp;Clacir Staudt,&nbsp;Aldo Fernando Somavilla Duarte,&nbsp;La Hore Correa Rodrigues,&nbsp;Cristiane Cauduro Lima,&nbsp;Vasco Morosini Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.rbciev.2015.12.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Orsiro is a hybrid stent which has passive (amorphous silicon carbide) and active (poly-L-lactic acid, PLLA) coatings. The first layer encapsulates the stent struts, promoting lower local inflammation, whereas the second layer releases sirolimus through a biodegradable matrix. This study's aim was to compare the results of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with Orsiro and Xience™ V stents (everolimus-eluting stent) in daily clinical practice.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Observational study in which patients were divided into two groups: those who received only one or more Orsiro stents, and those who received only Xience<sup>TM</sup> V stents. Early and late outcomes were prospectively collected.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Between September 2012 and March 2014, this study included 92 and 108 patients treated with Orsiro and Xience™ V stents, respectively. Clinical, angiographic, and procedure characteristics were mostly similar between groups. Rates of procedure success (98.9% vs. 95.4%; <em>p</em> <em>=</em> <!-->0.22), in-hospital mortality (1.1% vs. 0%; <em>p</em> <em>=</em> <!-->0.40) and stent thrombosis (0% vs. 0.9%, <em>p</em> <em>=</em> <!-->0.30) did not differ between groups. Time of follow-up was 434<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->111 and 477<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->66 days (<em>p</em> <em>=</em> <!-->0.23), respectively, and differences in mortality (0.9% vs. 0%, <em>p</em> <em>=</em> <!-->0.30), stent thrombosis (0% vs. 0.9%; <em>p</em> <em>=</em> <!-->0.30), or need for repeat revascularization of the target lesion (0% vs. 0.9%; <em>p</em> <em>=</em> <!-->0.30) were not observed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Orsiro and Xience™ V stents showed similar performance, with low rates of early and late clinical and angiographic events.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101094,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva (English Edition)","volume":"23 2","pages":"Pages 114-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbciev.2015.12.009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214123515000356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The Orsiro is a hybrid stent which has passive (amorphous silicon carbide) and active (poly-L-lactic acid, PLLA) coatings. The first layer encapsulates the stent struts, promoting lower local inflammation, whereas the second layer releases sirolimus through a biodegradable matrix. This study's aim was to compare the results of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with Orsiro and Xience™ V stents (everolimus-eluting stent) in daily clinical practice.

Methods

Observational study in which patients were divided into two groups: those who received only one or more Orsiro stents, and those who received only XienceTM V stents. Early and late outcomes were prospectively collected.

Results

Between September 2012 and March 2014, this study included 92 and 108 patients treated with Orsiro and Xience™ V stents, respectively. Clinical, angiographic, and procedure characteristics were mostly similar between groups. Rates of procedure success (98.9% vs. 95.4%; p = 0.22), in-hospital mortality (1.1% vs. 0%; p = 0.40) and stent thrombosis (0% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.30) did not differ between groups. Time of follow-up was 434 ± 111 and 477 ± 66 days (p = 0.23), respectively, and differences in mortality (0.9% vs. 0%, p = 0.30), stent thrombosis (0% vs. 0.9%; p = 0.30), or need for repeat revascularization of the target lesion (0% vs. 0.9%; p = 0.30) were not observed.

Conclusions

Orsiro and Xience™ V stents showed similar performance, with low rates of early and late clinical and angiographic events.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合西罗莫司洗脱支架或依维莫司洗脱支架治疗患者的早期和晚期预后
Orsiro是一种混合支架,具有被动(非晶碳化硅)和活性(聚l -乳酸,PLLA)涂层。第一层包裹支架支柱,促进局部炎症,而第二层通过可生物降解的基质释放西罗莫司。本研究的目的是比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)与Orsiro和Xience™V支架(依维莫司洗脱支架)在日常临床实践中的效果。方法观察性研究,将患者分为两组:仅接受一个或多个Orsiro支架组和仅接受XienceTM V支架组。前瞻性地收集早期和晚期结果。结果2012年9月至2014年3月,该研究分别纳入92例和108例使用Orsiro和Xience™V支架的患者。两组患者的临床、血管造影和手术特征基本相似。手术成功率(98.9% vs. 95.4%;P = 0.22),住院死亡率(1.1% vs. 0%;P = 0.40)和支架血栓形成(0% vs 0.9%, P = 0.30)组间无差异。随访时间分别为434±111天和477±66天(p = 0.23),死亡率(0.9% vs. 0%, p = 0.30)、支架内血栓形成(0% vs. 0.9%;P = 0.30),或者需要对目标病变进行重复血运重建(0% vs. 0.9%;P = 0.30)未观察到。结论sorsiro和Xience™V支架表现相似,早期和晚期临床及血管造影事件发生率均较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention in smokers Right heart catheterization through ultrasound-guided antecubital vein approach Transition between ticagrelor and two different doses of clopidogrel at hospital discharge in patients with acute coronary syndrome submitted to percutaneous coronary intervention Rare form of coronary fistula draining into the right ventricular apex Evaluation of scattered radiation and impact of local protective devices in an interventional cardiology laboratory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1