RELEASE AND DISCHARGE AGREEMENT IN THE COMPENSATION SETTLEMENT BY AIRLINES COMPANY (A NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL LAW PERSPECTIVE)

Nida Wafiqah, R. Rosmawati
{"title":"RELEASE AND DISCHARGE AGREEMENT IN THE COMPENSATION SETTLEMENT BY AIRLINES COMPANY (A NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL LAW PERSPECTIVE)","authors":"Nida Wafiqah, R. Rosmawati","doi":"10.24815/sjil.v1i2.19277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses the rules and implementation regarding the Release and Discharge Agreement in the compensation settlement process by airlines company based on national and international law. The results show that this release and discharge agreement is not per Article 186 of the Aviation Law, which regulate that the carrier as a business actor is prohibited from making special agreements or requirements that negate the carrier's responsibility or determine a lower limit than the current compensation limit. According to international law, this release and discharge agreement does not follow Article 26 of the 1999 Montreal Convention, which regulates that airlines companies are not allowed to form contracts that may reduce or eliminate the amount of liability. Hence, obstacles arise in the ccompensation settlements when using Release and Discharge Agreement documents, the method of airline liability, and proving the cause of the accident to exclude the payment of compensation settlements to passengers. It is recommended to improve the rules related to the carrier's responsibility to ensure that passengers could get their rights according to the provisions contained in the legislation and maximize the implementation of international conventions related to aviation that have been ratified into national regulations. Keywords: Compensation, Liability, Release and Discharge Agreement, Airline Company, Passenger.","PeriodicalId":368863,"journal":{"name":"Student Journal of International Law","volume":"54 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Student Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24815/sjil.v1i2.19277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper analyses the rules and implementation regarding the Release and Discharge Agreement in the compensation settlement process by airlines company based on national and international law. The results show that this release and discharge agreement is not per Article 186 of the Aviation Law, which regulate that the carrier as a business actor is prohibited from making special agreements or requirements that negate the carrier's responsibility or determine a lower limit than the current compensation limit. According to international law, this release and discharge agreement does not follow Article 26 of the 1999 Montreal Convention, which regulates that airlines companies are not allowed to form contracts that may reduce or eliminate the amount of liability. Hence, obstacles arise in the ccompensation settlements when using Release and Discharge Agreement documents, the method of airline liability, and proving the cause of the accident to exclude the payment of compensation settlements to passengers. It is recommended to improve the rules related to the carrier's responsibility to ensure that passengers could get their rights according to the provisions contained in the legislation and maximize the implementation of international conventions related to aviation that have been ratified into national regulations. Keywords: Compensation, Liability, Release and Discharge Agreement, Airline Company, Passenger.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
航空公司赔偿和解中的解除与解除协议(国内法与国际法视角)
本文以国内法和国际法为依据,分析了航空公司在赔偿结算过程中关于《放行协议》的规则和实施情况。结果表明,该放行协议不符合《航空法》第186条的规定,该条款规定承运人作为商业行为主体不得订立否定承运人责任或确定低于现行赔偿限额的特别协议或要求。根据国际法,这一放行协议不符合1999年《蒙特利尔公约》第26条的规定,即航空公司不得签订可能减少或消除责任金额的合同。因此,在使用放行协议文件、航空公司责任认定方法、证明事故原因排除向旅客支付赔偿时,在赔偿解决中存在障碍。建议完善承运人责任相关规则,确保乘客根据立法规定获得权利,并最大限度地实施已批准为国家法规的航空相关国际公约。关键词:赔偿责任解除协议航空公司乘客
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES OF INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT DISPUTE RESOLUTION I N ICSID ARBITRATION FOREIGN VESSEL SINKING POLICY IN ERADICATING ILLEGAL, UNREPORTED, AND UNREGULATED (IUU) FISHING IN THE INDONESIAN EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE (IEEZ) RESPONSIBILITY OF THE RECEIVING STATE IN PROTECTING THE DIPLOMATIC PREMISES (Case Of The Lowering Of The Iranian Embassy Flag In London) CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) FOR THE REMEDY OF AFFECTED PEOPLE IN CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY CASE IN NORTH ACEH, INDONESIA APPLICATION OF HARDSHIP RULE UNDER THE UNIDROIT PRINCIPLES OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL CONTRACTS IN INDONESIA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1