Not going to take this anymore: Multi-objective overtime planning for Software Engineering projects

F. Ferrucci, M. Harman, Jian Ren, Federica Sarro
{"title":"Not going to take this anymore: Multi-objective overtime planning for Software Engineering projects","authors":"F. Ferrucci, M. Harman, Jian Ren, Federica Sarro","doi":"10.1109/ICSE.2013.6606592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software Engineering and development is well-known to suffer from unplanned overtime, which causes stress and illness in engineers and can lead to poor quality software with higher defects. In this paper, we introduce a multi-objective decision support approach to help balance project risks and duration against overtime, so that software engineers can better plan overtime. We evaluate our approach on 6 real world software projects, drawn from 3 organisations using 3 standard evaluation measures and 3 different approaches to risk assessment. Our results show that our approach was significantly better (p <; 0.05) than standard multi-objective search in 76% of experiments (with high Cohen effect size in 85% of these) and was significantly better than currently used overtime planning strategies in 100% of experiments (with high effect size in all). We also show how our approach provides actionable overtime planning results and investigate the impact of the three different forms of risk assessment.","PeriodicalId":322423,"journal":{"name":"2013 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)","volume":"34 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"76","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2013.6606592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 76

Abstract

Software Engineering and development is well-known to suffer from unplanned overtime, which causes stress and illness in engineers and can lead to poor quality software with higher defects. In this paper, we introduce a multi-objective decision support approach to help balance project risks and duration against overtime, so that software engineers can better plan overtime. We evaluate our approach on 6 real world software projects, drawn from 3 organisations using 3 standard evaluation measures and 3 different approaches to risk assessment. Our results show that our approach was significantly better (p <; 0.05) than standard multi-objective search in 76% of experiments (with high Cohen effect size in 85% of these) and was significantly better than currently used overtime planning strategies in 100% of experiments (with high effect size in all). We also show how our approach provides actionable overtime planning results and investigate the impact of the three different forms of risk assessment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我不想再讨论这个问题了:软件工程项目的多目标加班计划
众所周知,软件工程和开发会遭受计划外的加班,这会给工程师带来压力和疾病,并可能导致质量差的软件和更高的缺陷。在本文中,我们介绍了一种多目标决策支持方法,以帮助平衡项目风险和工期与加班,以便软件工程师可以更好地计划加班。我们在6个真实世界的软件项目中评估了我们的方法,这些项目来自3个组织,使用3种标准评估方法和3种不同的风险评估方法。我们的结果表明,我们的方法明显更好(p <;0.05)在76%的实验中优于标准的多目标搜索(其中85%的实验具有高科恩效应量),并且在100%的实验中显著优于目前使用的加班计划策略(所有实验均具有高效应量)。我们还展示了我们的方法如何提供可操作的加班计划结果,并调查了三种不同形式的风险评估的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Studios in software engineering education: Towards an evaluable model Not going to take this anymore: Multi-objective overtime planning for Software Engineering projects 3rd International workshop on collaborative teaching of globally distributed software development (CTGDSD 2013) TestEvol: A tool for analyzing test-suite evolution A characteristic study on failures of production distributed data-parallel programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1