The Effects of Managerial Discretion in Multi-Task Environments: Experimental Evidence

M. Arnold, Kai A. Bauch
{"title":"The Effects of Managerial Discretion in Multi-Task Environments: Experimental Evidence","authors":"M. Arnold, Kai A. Bauch","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3612084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study uses an experiment to investigate managerial discretion in multi-task environments. Prior work provides evidence that managerial discretion often affects performance less positively or even negatively in these environments. We identify and analyze three potential drivers for these effects. First, for fairness reasons, employees may not prefer bonus allocations based on efficient effort only. Second, the mere presence of a manager (as opposed to an automatic bonus allocation) may lead employees to be concerned about how bonuses will be allocated. This consumes cognitive resources and may distort effort provision. Finally, managers could deliberately deviate from rewarding efficient effort because their assessment of employees’ fairness preferences for rewarding inefficient effort is biased. In line with our predictions, we find evidence in favor of the second and third driver but not the first. Our results contribute by enhancing our understanding of the effects of managerial discretion in multi-task environments.","PeriodicalId":357263,"journal":{"name":"Managerial Accounting eJournal","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managerial Accounting eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3612084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study uses an experiment to investigate managerial discretion in multi-task environments. Prior work provides evidence that managerial discretion often affects performance less positively or even negatively in these environments. We identify and analyze three potential drivers for these effects. First, for fairness reasons, employees may not prefer bonus allocations based on efficient effort only. Second, the mere presence of a manager (as opposed to an automatic bonus allocation) may lead employees to be concerned about how bonuses will be allocated. This consumes cognitive resources and may distort effort provision. Finally, managers could deliberately deviate from rewarding efficient effort because their assessment of employees’ fairness preferences for rewarding inefficient effort is biased. In line with our predictions, we find evidence in favor of the second and third driver but not the first. Our results contribute by enhancing our understanding of the effects of managerial discretion in multi-task environments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多任务环境下管理自由裁量权的影响:实验证据
本研究采用实验方法探讨多任务环境下的管理自由裁量权。先前的研究证明,在这些环境中,管理自由裁量权对绩效的影响往往不是积极的,甚至是消极的。我们确定并分析了这些影响的三个潜在驱动因素。首先,出于公平的原因,员工可能不喜欢只根据工作效率分配奖金。其次,仅仅是经理在场(而不是自动分配奖金)就可能导致员工关心奖金将如何分配。这会消耗认知资源,并可能扭曲努力提供。最后,管理者可能会故意偏离奖励高效工作的方向,因为他们对员工对奖励低效工作的公平偏好的评估是有偏见的。与我们的预测一致,我们找到了支持第二个和第三个司机的证据,而不是第一个司机。我们的研究结果有助于提高我们对多任务环境中管理自由裁量权影响的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Truncated Balancing Policy for Perishable Inventory Management: Combating High Shortage Penalties Disclosure Paternalism Legal Expertise and the Role of Litigation Risk in Firms’ Conservatism Choices Is Consistency the Panacea? Inconsistent or Consistent Tax Transfer Prices with Strategic Taxpayer and Tax Authority Behavior Government Transparency and Firm-Level Operational Efficiency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1