Conversational conventions and participation in cross-functional design teams

E. Wynn, D. Novick
{"title":"Conversational conventions and participation in cross-functional design teams","authors":"E. Wynn, D. Novick","doi":"10.1145/224019.224046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The benefit of participatory teams—their cross-functional and diverse nature—presents a converse challenge to communicate in a common “language”, using shared conventions, against the backdrops of an unfamiliar speech context and the tacit organizational social structure. This paper employs constructs from several language-use theories to identify mismatched conventions and consequent confusion that impede or inhibit full participation in settings like system design or work-process redesign.","PeriodicalId":338751,"journal":{"name":"Conference on Organizational Computing Systems","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conference on Organizational Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/224019.224046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

The benefit of participatory teams—their cross-functional and diverse nature—presents a converse challenge to communicate in a common “language”, using shared conventions, against the backdrops of an unfamiliar speech context and the tacit organizational social structure. This paper employs constructs from several language-use theories to identify mismatched conventions and consequent confusion that impede or inhibit full participation in settings like system design or work-process redesign.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
会话约定和跨职能设计团队的参与
参与式团队的好处——他们的跨职能和多样性——提出了一个相反的挑战,即在不熟悉的语言环境和默契的组织社会结构的背景下,使用共同的“语言”,使用共同的惯例进行交流。本文采用了几种语言使用理论的结构来识别不匹配的惯例和随之而来的混淆,这些混淆阻碍或抑制了系统设计或工作流程重新设计等设置的充分参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Applying specialization to process models Combining local negotiation and global planning in cooperative software development projects Answer Garden: a tool for growing organizational memory Conversational conventions and participation in cross-functional design teams WorkFlow systems: a few definitions and a few suggestions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1