{"title":"“Survival strategies” in history methodology","authors":"Natalia Kuzovova","doi":"10.32523/2616-7255-2022-139-2-96-106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article considers the meaning of the term “survival strategy” in historical science, prospects, and practices of its use in the study of traumatic historical experiences, including the history of the famine of 1932-1933. The term “survival strategy” is widely used in ecology, economics, history, psychophysiology, and psychotraumatology. Even though survival strategies during the Holocaust, Holodomor, and Great Famine in China are a topic that is still popular but there are works in which this term is included in the title, there is no clear definition of this term in historical science. The article considers the meaning of the term “survival strategy” in historical science and analyzes the prospects and practices of its use in the study of traumatic historical experiences, including the history of the famine of 1932-1933. The methodological basis of the study is an interdisciplinary approach. The methodology for defining the concept of “survival strategy” is based on the work of biology, genetics, ecology, trauma psychology, psychophysiology and neurobiology, and economic theory. Practices of using the terms “survival strategy” in historical science are analyzed. Thus, as we can see, the concept of “survival strategy” has taken its place in historical science and is widely used in practice, in the study of the history of traumatic experiences, such as the Holodomor of 1932-1933. An interdisciplinary approach allows the successful use of the methods of natural and social sciences in the historical humanities.","PeriodicalId":117377,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Historical Sciences. Philosophy. Religion Series","volume":"51 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Historical Sciences. Philosophy. Religion Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32523/2616-7255-2022-139-2-96-106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article considers the meaning of the term “survival strategy” in historical science, prospects, and practices of its use in the study of traumatic historical experiences, including the history of the famine of 1932-1933. The term “survival strategy” is widely used in ecology, economics, history, psychophysiology, and psychotraumatology. Even though survival strategies during the Holocaust, Holodomor, and Great Famine in China are a topic that is still popular but there are works in which this term is included in the title, there is no clear definition of this term in historical science. The article considers the meaning of the term “survival strategy” in historical science and analyzes the prospects and practices of its use in the study of traumatic historical experiences, including the history of the famine of 1932-1933. The methodological basis of the study is an interdisciplinary approach. The methodology for defining the concept of “survival strategy” is based on the work of biology, genetics, ecology, trauma psychology, psychophysiology and neurobiology, and economic theory. Practices of using the terms “survival strategy” in historical science are analyzed. Thus, as we can see, the concept of “survival strategy” has taken its place in historical science and is widely used in practice, in the study of the history of traumatic experiences, such as the Holodomor of 1932-1933. An interdisciplinary approach allows the successful use of the methods of natural and social sciences in the historical humanities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
历史方法论中的“生存策略”
本文考虑了“生存策略”一词在历史科学中的意义、前景,以及它在研究创伤性历史经验(包括1932-1933年饥荒的历史)中的应用。“生存策略”一词广泛应用于生态学、经济学、历史学、心理生理学和心理创伤学等领域。尽管大屠杀、大饥荒和中国大饥荒期间的生存策略是一个很受欢迎的话题,但也有一些作品将这个词包含在标题中,但在历史科学中没有明确的定义。本文考虑了“生存策略”一词在历史科学中的意义,并分析了它在创伤性历史经验研究中的前景和实践,包括1932-1933年饥荒的历史。本研究的方法论基础是跨学科的方法。定义“生存策略”概念的方法是基于生物学、遗传学、生态学、创伤心理学、心理生理学和神经生物学以及经济学理论的工作。分析了历史科学中使用“生存策略”的实践。因此,正如我们所看到的,“生存策略”的概念已经在历史科学中占据了一席之地,并被广泛应用于实践中,在创伤经历的历史研究中,如1932-1933年的大屠杀。跨学科的方法允许在历史人文科学中成功地使用自然科学和社会科学的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trends in Western Historiography of Central Asia: A case of “Central Asian Survey” “Survival strategies” in history methodology Typology of healers in the daily culture of kazakhs and their practice of treatment: cultural and anthropological analysis The historiography of the demography of Pavlodar priirtyshye Non-violence as a philosophical problem
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1