Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire for Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Sinhala Translation and Validation Study

B. Ranasinghe, A. Balasuriya, C. Wijeyaratne, N. Fernando
{"title":"Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire for Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Sinhala Translation and Validation Study","authors":"B. Ranasinghe, A. Balasuriya, C. Wijeyaratne, N. Fernando","doi":"10.4038/jccpsl.v27i2.8335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) has a negative impact on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of affected women. There are no studies conducted on HRQoL of women with PCOS in Sri Lanka, partly due to non-availability of a disease-specific validated tool. Objectives: To translate and evaluate the validity and reliability of the modified polycystic ovary syndrome health-related quality of life questionnaire (M - PCOSQ) among Sri Lankan women with PCOS Methods: The M-PCOSQ was translated into Sinhala language and content and consensual validity was assessed using modified Delphi process. The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sinhala version and translated M-PCOSQ were completed by 94 participants attending three different clinics at a maternity hospital in Sri Lanka. Convergent validity was measured using SF-36 while divergent validity was not measured due to the absence of a suitable tool. Ethical issues were adequately addressed. Retest was done in 10% of the sample two weeks later. Results: With the modified Delphi process, items 4, 10 and 27 of M-PCOSQ Sinhala version were stated as positive statements and scoring changed accordingly. The mean age of the sample was 27.13 years and the majority (77.1% had no children). All six domains of M-PCOSQ had high intra-class correlation coefficients ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 demonstrating excellent test-retest reliability. Cronbach's alpha was 0.67 or more for four of the six domains indicating satisfactory internal consistency. Construct validity was observed by the high correlation between emotion subscale of M-PCOSQ and emotional well-being scale of SF-36 (r=0.63; p<0.01). Conclusions and Recommendations: M-PCOSQ-Sinhala version is a valid and reliable tool to measure HRQoL of PCOS women.","PeriodicalId":120205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the College of Community Physicians of Sri Lanka","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the College of Community Physicians of Sri Lanka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/jccpsl.v27i2.8335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) has a negative impact on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of affected women. There are no studies conducted on HRQoL of women with PCOS in Sri Lanka, partly due to non-availability of a disease-specific validated tool. Objectives: To translate and evaluate the validity and reliability of the modified polycystic ovary syndrome health-related quality of life questionnaire (M - PCOSQ) among Sri Lankan women with PCOS Methods: The M-PCOSQ was translated into Sinhala language and content and consensual validity was assessed using modified Delphi process. The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sinhala version and translated M-PCOSQ were completed by 94 participants attending three different clinics at a maternity hospital in Sri Lanka. Convergent validity was measured using SF-36 while divergent validity was not measured due to the absence of a suitable tool. Ethical issues were adequately addressed. Retest was done in 10% of the sample two weeks later. Results: With the modified Delphi process, items 4, 10 and 27 of M-PCOSQ Sinhala version were stated as positive statements and scoring changed accordingly. The mean age of the sample was 27.13 years and the majority (77.1% had no children). All six domains of M-PCOSQ had high intra-class correlation coefficients ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 demonstrating excellent test-retest reliability. Cronbach's alpha was 0.67 or more for four of the six domains indicating satisfactory internal consistency. Construct validity was observed by the high correlation between emotion subscale of M-PCOSQ and emotional well-being scale of SF-36 (r=0.63; p<0.01). Conclusions and Recommendations: M-PCOSQ-Sinhala version is a valid and reliable tool to measure HRQoL of PCOS women.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多囊卵巢综合征妇女健康相关生活质量问卷:僧伽罗语翻译与验证研究
简介:多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)对受影响妇女的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)有负面影响。斯里兰卡没有对多囊卵巢综合征妇女的HRQoL进行研究,部分原因是缺乏针对疾病的有效工具。目的:翻译并评价斯里兰卡多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)妇女健康相关生活质量问卷(M -PCOSQ)的效度和信度。方法:将M-PCOSQ问卷翻译成僧伽罗语,采用改进德尔菲法评估问卷内容和共识效度。简短健康调查(SF-36)僧伽罗语版本和翻译的M-PCOSQ由斯里兰卡一家妇产医院的三个不同诊所的94名参与者完成。使用SF-36测量收敛效度,而由于缺乏合适的工具,未测量发散效度。伦理问题得到充分解决。两周后对10%的样本进行复测。结果:采用改进的德尔菲法,M-PCOSQ僧伽罗语版的第4、10、27项被表述为积极命题,评分也随之改变。样本的平均年龄为27.13岁,大多数(77.1%)无子女。M-PCOSQ的6个域均具有较高的类内相关系数,范围在0.97 ~ 0.99之间,具有良好的重测信度。六个领域中的四个领域的Cronbach's alpha值为0.67或更高,表明内部一致性令人满意。M-PCOSQ情绪分量表与SF-36情绪幸福感量表高度相关(r=0.63;p < 0.01)。结论与建议:M-PCOSQ-Sinhala版是测量PCOS妇女HRQoL的有效、可靠的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and correlates of anxiety disorders among school children aged 13-15 years in Colombo District, Sri Lanka Reflections on the evolution of Community Medicine education Factors associated with delays in seeking treatment for leptospirosis: a prospective study in Monaragala District, Sri Lanka Quality of life among patients undergoing haemodialysis for chronic kidney disease: a cross-sectional study from Western India A mixed method evaluation of the quasi-experimental yoga-based intervention for the behavioural issues of school-going early adolescents in Jaffna, Sri Lanka
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1