THE CONCEPTUAL MEANING OF THE CONCEPT OF "CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT" IN THE CRIMINAL LAW OF RUSSIA AND GERMANY: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

A. Serebrennikova, Andrey Kuznetsov
{"title":"THE CONCEPTUAL MEANING OF THE CONCEPT OF \"CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT\" IN THE CRIMINAL LAW OF RUSSIA AND GERMANY: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS","authors":"A. Serebrennikova, Andrey Kuznetsov","doi":"10.33693/2072-3164-2022-15-2-128-133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study. The proposed article presents an analysis of the conceptual meaning of the category of criminal misconduct in Russia and Germany in order to demonstrate the \"foreignness\" of the offense for the Russian criminal legislation. The article points out the fundamental differences between its proposed designs by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and the design of a misdemeanor in the Criminal Code of Germany. Conclusions. The authors conducted a sociological survey of 62 respondents on the expediency of introducing the category in question into Russian criminal law, the result of which is a statement of awareness by persons both with and without higher legal education of its \"foreignness\" for Russian criminal law. The article shows that a criminal offense contradicts the material concept of a crime in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and other criminal law institutions and norms of Russian criminal law based on the category of public danger of crime and personality. The authors also conclude that the category of misconduct is insignificant for both the legislator and the law enforcement officer in Germany. While the consolidation of a criminal offense in the Russian criminal legislation will entail serious and at the same time scientifically unjustified changes in it.","PeriodicalId":446864,"journal":{"name":"Gaps in Russian Legislation","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gaps in Russian Legislation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33693/2072-3164-2022-15-2-128-133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the study. The proposed article presents an analysis of the conceptual meaning of the category of criminal misconduct in Russia and Germany in order to demonstrate the "foreignness" of the offense for the Russian criminal legislation. The article points out the fundamental differences between its proposed designs by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and the design of a misdemeanor in the Criminal Code of Germany. Conclusions. The authors conducted a sociological survey of 62 respondents on the expediency of introducing the category in question into Russian criminal law, the result of which is a statement of awareness by persons both with and without higher legal education of its "foreignness" for Russian criminal law. The article shows that a criminal offense contradicts the material concept of a crime in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and other criminal law institutions and norms of Russian criminal law based on the category of public danger of crime and personality. The authors also conclude that the category of misconduct is insignificant for both the legislator and the law enforcement officer in Germany. While the consolidation of a criminal offense in the Russian criminal legislation will entail serious and at the same time scientifically unjustified changes in it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄德刑法中“不当行为”概念的概念意义比较分析
研究的目的。本文拟对俄罗斯和德国的犯罪行为范畴的概念意义进行分析,以论证该犯罪行为在俄罗斯刑事立法中的“异质性”。本文指出了俄罗斯联邦最高法院提出的设计与德国刑法中的轻罪设计之间的根本区别。结论。作者对62名答复者进行了一项社会学调查,调查的结果是,受过和没有受过高等法律教育的人都意识到这一类别对俄罗斯刑法的“异域性”。本文从犯罪公害的范畴和人格的范畴出发,论证了刑事犯罪与俄罗斯联邦刑法典以及俄罗斯刑法其他法律制度和规范中关于犯罪的实质概念相矛盾。作者还得出结论,在德国,不当行为的类别对立法者和执法人员来说都是微不足道的。而刑事犯罪在俄罗斯刑事立法中的巩固将导致严重的,同时在科学上不合理的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ENTREPRENEURIAL ACTIVITY IN MODERN REALITIES: PUBLIC-LEGAL AND PRIVATE LEGAL ASPECTS SCIENTIFIC AND METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO THE CREATION OF A DATA MATRIX AS A PRIORITY INSTRUMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE «SINGLE WINDOW» MECHANISM IN THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION CTP INSURANCE IN THE LEGAL ASPECT: NEW APPROACHES AND PROSPECTS CATEGORIES OF «SUFFICIENCY» AND «MERIT» WHEN DECIDING ON THE RELEASE OF A PERSON FROM CRIMINAL LIABILITY ON EVALUATIVE GROUNDS PROBLEMS OF SOCIAL SECURITY AND PROTECTION OF FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN OF MOBILIZED CITIZENS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1