‘Where the Parents are of the Same Sex’: Quebec’s Reforms to Filiation

R. Leckey
{"title":"‘Where the Parents are of the Same Sex’: Quebec’s Reforms to Filiation","authors":"R. Leckey","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebn014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To advance debates on legal responses to parenting by gay and lesbian couples, the paper introduces reforms enacted by the legislature of Quebec, a civil law jurisdiction with a codified private law, in 2002. Quebec's pioneering regime permits two persons of the same sex to register as a child's parents from birth, not only by adoption. They may do so if they conceived the child as part of a \"parental project.\" Moreover, a person alone may have a child via a parental project. The paper identifies the policy choices reflected in the amendments and highlights weaknesses in the drafting, instructive to policy makers in civil law or common law jurisdictions. It emphasizes the structural difficulty of amending the civil law's fundamental institution of filiation to recognize two parents of the same sex. Comparing with ad hoc judicial developments from a Canadian common law province, it underscores the potential in systematic legislative reform. Conservative scholars have resisted the new regime as an inappropriate departure from the pursuit of filiation's biological vocation. The study reveals how selectively jurists may remember the past and how swiftly they may characterize innovations relating to parentage - such as the earlier abolition of illegitimacy - as natural. The mingling of biological fact and fiction in the new regime underscores the similar blending in more traditional forms of filiation.","PeriodicalId":448538,"journal":{"name":"OUP: International Journal of Law","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OUP: International Journal of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebn014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

To advance debates on legal responses to parenting by gay and lesbian couples, the paper introduces reforms enacted by the legislature of Quebec, a civil law jurisdiction with a codified private law, in 2002. Quebec's pioneering regime permits two persons of the same sex to register as a child's parents from birth, not only by adoption. They may do so if they conceived the child as part of a "parental project." Moreover, a person alone may have a child via a parental project. The paper identifies the policy choices reflected in the amendments and highlights weaknesses in the drafting, instructive to policy makers in civil law or common law jurisdictions. It emphasizes the structural difficulty of amending the civil law's fundamental institution of filiation to recognize two parents of the same sex. Comparing with ad hoc judicial developments from a Canadian common law province, it underscores the potential in systematic legislative reform. Conservative scholars have resisted the new regime as an inappropriate departure from the pursuit of filiation's biological vocation. The study reveals how selectively jurists may remember the past and how swiftly they may characterize innovations relating to parentage - such as the earlier abolition of illegitimacy - as natural. The mingling of biological fact and fiction in the new regime underscores the similar blending in more traditional forms of filiation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“父母是同性的地方”:魁北克的家庭改革
为了推进对男女同性恋伴侣养育子女的法律回应的辩论,本文介绍了魁北克立法机构在2002年制定的改革措施。魁北克是一个民法司法管辖区,同时也编纂了私法。魁北克开创性的制度允许两名同性的人从出生起就登记为孩子的父母,而不仅仅是通过收养。如果他们把这个孩子作为“父母计划”的一部分,他们可能会这样做。此外,一个单独的人可能会通过父母的项目有一个孩子。本文指出了修订中反映的政策选择,并指出了起草中的不足之处,对大陆法系或英美法系的政策制定者具有借鉴意义。它强调了修改民法的基本婚姻制度以承认同性父母的结构性困难。与加拿大普通法省的临时司法发展相比,它强调了系统立法改革的潜力。保守派学者反对这种新制度,认为它不恰当地背离了对家庭生物学使命的追求。这项研究揭示了法学家如何有选择性地记住过去,以及他们如何迅速地将与亲子关系有关的创新——比如早些时候废除非婚生——定性为自然的。在新体制中,生物学事实和虚构的混合凸显了在更传统的亲属关系形式中类似的混合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
‘So Hedge Therefore, Who Join Forever’: Understanding the Interrelation of No-Fault Divorce and Premarital Contracts ‘Where the Parents are of the Same Sex’: Quebec’s Reforms to Filiation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1