Ambiguitas Konsep Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pekerja Sosial

Rayno Dwi Adityo
{"title":"Ambiguitas Konsep Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pekerja Sosial","authors":"Rayno Dwi Adityo","doi":"10.52947/morality.v8i1.253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: \nSocial worker is a profession that belonging to solve a social dysfunction problems. The forms vary according to needs, for example medical personnel, general personnel, psychologists and others. All provisions for the main tasks of the function are inside the regulation of social worker. There was have interesting issue about the legal protection aspect at the regulation such as unsystematic arrangement of language and multiple interpretation on the chapter of the rule. This research is trying to decrypt ambiguity content of social worker legal protection aspect. This types of research use yuridis normative with library approach, for the analyzing technique analytical description. Primery legal materials consist of such UU RI Nomor 14 Tahun 2019 Tentang Pekerja Sosial and other regulations. Secondary legal materials using law book’s, law journal, scientific journal. In addition supported with tertiary data sources kind of electronic media. The result reveal that the sentences structure out of legal protection aspect is not comply with the right standart procedure. Consequently the value of certainty, justice and law benefit potentially difficult to access by social worker when they come in contact with legal problem’s, for the example we can see to law pretection aspect owned by advocat where made clear sentence’s on they regulation. \nKeyword: social workers, law protection, multiple interpretation","PeriodicalId":231432,"journal":{"name":"MORALITY: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MORALITY: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52947/morality.v8i1.253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract: Social worker is a profession that belonging to solve a social dysfunction problems. The forms vary according to needs, for example medical personnel, general personnel, psychologists and others. All provisions for the main tasks of the function are inside the regulation of social worker. There was have interesting issue about the legal protection aspect at the regulation such as unsystematic arrangement of language and multiple interpretation on the chapter of the rule. This research is trying to decrypt ambiguity content of social worker legal protection aspect. This types of research use yuridis normative with library approach, for the analyzing technique analytical description. Primery legal materials consist of such UU RI Nomor 14 Tahun 2019 Tentang Pekerja Sosial and other regulations. Secondary legal materials using law book’s, law journal, scientific journal. In addition supported with tertiary data sources kind of electronic media. The result reveal that the sentences structure out of legal protection aspect is not comply with the right standart procedure. Consequently the value of certainty, justice and law benefit potentially difficult to access by social worker when they come in contact with legal problem’s, for the example we can see to law pretection aspect owned by advocat where made clear sentence’s on they regulation. Keyword: social workers, law protection, multiple interpretation
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法律保护社会工作者的模糊概念
摘要:社会工作者是一种属于解决社会功能障碍问题的职业。表格因需要而异,例如医务人员、一般人员、心理学家和其他人员。所有关于社会工作者职能主要任务的规定都在《社会工作者条例》的范围内。在规则的法律保护方面存在着一些有趣的问题,如规则章节的语言安排不系统和多重解释。本研究试图对社会工作者法律保护方面的歧义内容进行解密。这类研究采用了文献规范与库法,对分析技术进行了分析描述。主要法律材料包括UU RI Nomor 14 Tahun 2019 tenang Pekerja social和其他法规。二手法律资料使用法律书籍、法律期刊、科学期刊。此外还支持与三级数据源类的电子媒体。结果表明,法律保护方面的句子结构不符合正确的标准程序。因此,社会工作者在接触法律问题时,可能难以获得确定性、正义和法律利益的价值,例如,我们可以看到倡导者在法律保护方面对他们的规定做出了明确的判决。关键词:社会工作者,法律保护,多重解读
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Budaya Korupsi Dan Kebijakan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (Money Laundering) Peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Terhadap Pencegahan Transaksi Keuangan Mencurigakan Pada Sektor Perbankan Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 Tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Covid-19 Sebagai Keadaan Overmacht Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Kedudukan Perjanjian Kredit Dengan Jaminan Analisis Yuridis Prinsip Teritorial Pada Cross Border Insolvency Perspektif Hukum Kepailitan Di Indonesia Penafsiran Otoritatif dan Hermeneutika Yuridis Pada Frasa Repertorium Kewajiban Notaris
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1