Assessment of Learning Outcomes in the (Java) Object-Oriented Programming Courses

I. O. Biskupic, Aleksander Radovan, Josip Lopatič
{"title":"Assessment of Learning Outcomes in the (Java) Object-Oriented Programming Courses","authors":"I. O. Biskupic, Aleksander Radovan, Josip Lopatič","doi":"10.1109/ICIET56899.2023.10111296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to obtain students' review on the possible difficulties and workload when mastering the prescribed learning outcomes in object-oriented programming courses based on the JAVA™ programming language. The results of this measurement provide a basis for a possible revision of scheduled hourly rate and consequently ECTS points required for students to achieve the prescribed learning outcomes regarding ESG 2015 guidelines for QA. Perennial experience in teaching indicate that object-oriented programming courses are one of the most demanding in mastering the subject material at the undergraduate level (6 EQF), which is why authors have conducted a survey as part of the JAVA™ course before the final exam at 4 different higher education institutions in the Republic of Croatia. On a scale from 1 to 5 (5 being the highest), students have assessed the difficulty in achieving each learning outcome and also the subjects/topics taught in the course. The results of the survey were compared with the passing results in the summer exams period (academic year 2021/2022 as an additional variable test of the obtained answers). The authors present the summary of their results and provide the conclusion in the context of the subject and course revision regarding curriculum and subject oriented student workload.","PeriodicalId":332586,"journal":{"name":"2023 11th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET)","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 11th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIET56899.2023.10111296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to obtain students' review on the possible difficulties and workload when mastering the prescribed learning outcomes in object-oriented programming courses based on the JAVA™ programming language. The results of this measurement provide a basis for a possible revision of scheduled hourly rate and consequently ECTS points required for students to achieve the prescribed learning outcomes regarding ESG 2015 guidelines for QA. Perennial experience in teaching indicate that object-oriented programming courses are one of the most demanding in mastering the subject material at the undergraduate level (6 EQF), which is why authors have conducted a survey as part of the JAVA™ course before the final exam at 4 different higher education institutions in the Republic of Croatia. On a scale from 1 to 5 (5 being the highest), students have assessed the difficulty in achieving each learning outcome and also the subjects/topics taught in the course. The results of the survey were compared with the passing results in the summer exams period (academic year 2021/2022 as an additional variable test of the obtained answers). The authors present the summary of their results and provide the conclusion in the context of the subject and course revision regarding curriculum and subject oriented student workload.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(Java)面向对象程序设计课程学习成果评估
本文的目的是了解学生在掌握基于JAVA™编程语言的面向对象编程课程中规定的学习成果时可能遇到的困难和工作量。这项测量的结果为可能修订计划小时费率和学生达到ESG 2015 QA指导方针规定的学习成果所需的ECTS分数提供了基础。长期的教学经验表明,面向对象编程课程是对本科阶段(6 EQF)的主题材料掌握要求最高的课程之一,这就是为什么作者在克罗地亚共和国的4所不同的高等教育机构进行了一项调查,作为JAVA™课程期末考试的一部分。从1到5(5是最高的),学生们评估了实现每个学习成果的难度,以及课程中教授的科目/主题。将调查结果与夏季考试期间(2021/2022学年作为获得答案的附加变量测试)的通过结果进行比较。作者总结了他们的研究结果,并在课程和学科导向学生工作量的学科和课程修订的背景下提供了结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using Deep Learning to Track Representational Flexibility Development of Children with Autism in a Virtual World Emotional Responses toward the Flipped Classroom Approach across Academic Disciplines Assessment of Learning Outcomes in the (Java) Object-Oriented Programming Courses Human’s Reaction Time Based Score Calculation of Self-practice Dynamic Yoga System for User’s Feedback by OpenPose and Fuzzy Rules Using 360 Virtual Reality Video in History Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1