Product and Process Innovation - A Cross Country Comparison Between Croatia, Poland and the UK

Marina Dabic, A. Razum, R. Brečić
{"title":"Product and Process Innovation - A Cross Country Comparison Between Croatia, Poland and the UK","authors":"Marina Dabic, A. Razum, R. Brečić","doi":"10.56578/jcgirm03s105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper focuses on the determining the product and process innovation in three different countries: Croatia, Poland and the UK. The purpose of this study is to investigate significant differences among companies that report product and process innovation relative to different market contexts that they operate in and their reported R&D intensity. Using the survey data of 380 entrepreneurs and business executives from three countries: Croatia, Poland and the UK three regression models have been tested as well as significant differences among groups. The empirical results indicate conditional similarities in Croatian, Polish and British firms and respective investment into R&D. Related to product innovation, this study confirmed that UK is significantly better than Croatia, and for process innovation results revealed that UK has significantly better score than both Croatia and Poland. Regarding R&D intensity results indicate that Croatia reports higher levels than Poland.","PeriodicalId":404632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Governance, Insurance, and Risk Management","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Governance, Insurance, and Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56578/jcgirm03s105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper focuses on the determining the product and process innovation in three different countries: Croatia, Poland and the UK. The purpose of this study is to investigate significant differences among companies that report product and process innovation relative to different market contexts that they operate in and their reported R&D intensity. Using the survey data of 380 entrepreneurs and business executives from three countries: Croatia, Poland and the UK three regression models have been tested as well as significant differences among groups. The empirical results indicate conditional similarities in Croatian, Polish and British firms and respective investment into R&D. Related to product innovation, this study confirmed that UK is significantly better than Croatia, and for process innovation results revealed that UK has significantly better score than both Croatia and Poland. Regarding R&D intensity results indicate that Croatia reports higher levels than Poland.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产品和工艺创新——克罗地亚、波兰和英国的跨国比较
本文主要研究了克罗地亚、波兰和英国三个不同国家的产品和工艺创新。本研究的目的是探讨不同市场环境下报告产品和工艺创新的公司及其报告的研发强度之间的显著差异。利用来自克罗地亚、波兰和英国这三个国家的380名企业家和企业高管的调查数据,我们对三种回归模型进行了测试,并发现了群体之间的显著差异。实证结果表明,克罗地亚、波兰和英国的企业及其各自的研发投资条件相似。在产品创新方面,本研究证实英国显著优于克罗地亚,在工艺创新结果方面,英国显著优于克罗地亚和波兰。关于研发强度,结果表明克罗地亚报告的水平高于波兰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of COVID-19 on Audit Risk Assessment Procedures: Insights from Malta A View of the Future of the Metaverse Economy on the Basis of The Global Financial System: New Opportunities and Risks Citizen Satisfaction and Influential Factors of E-Government Services During the COVID-19 Crisis: A Turkish Case Study Evaluating Economic Crisis Theory: A Comprehensive Examination of the Aftalion Methodology The Long-Term Benefits of Quality Costs in Achieving Sustainable Development: A Benefit-Cost Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1