Comparative study of 8 and 10-bit HEVC encoders

Jarno Vanne, Marko Viitanen, Ari Koivula, T. Hämäläinen
{"title":"Comparative study of 8 and 10-bit HEVC encoders","authors":"Jarno Vanne, Marko Viitanen, Ari Koivula, T. Hämäläinen","doi":"10.1109/VCIP.2014.7051626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares the rate-distortion-complexity (RDC) characteristics of the HEVC Main 10 Profile (M10P) and Main Profile (MP) encoders. The evaluations are performed with HEVC reference encoder (HM) whose M10P and MP are benchmarked with different resolutions, frame rates, and bit depths. The reported RD results are based on bit rate differences for equal PSNR whereas complexities have been profiled with Intel VTune on Intel Core 2 processor. With our 10-bit 4K 120 fps test set, the average bit rate decrements of M10P over MP are 5.8%, 11.6%, and 12.3% in the all-intra (AI), random access (RA), and low-delay B (LB) configurations, respectively. Decreasing the bit depth of this test set to 8 lowers the RD gain of Ml OP only slightly to 5.4% (AI), 11.4% (RA), and 12.1% (LB). The similar trend continues in all our tests even though the RD gain of M10P is decreased over MP with lower resolutions and frame rates. M10P introduces no computational overhead in HM, but it is anticipated to increase complexity and double the memory usage in practical encoders. Hence, the 10-bit HEVC encoding with 8-bit input video is the most recommended option if computation and memory resources are adequate for it.","PeriodicalId":166978,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE Visual Communications and Image Processing Conference","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE Visual Communications and Image Processing Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VCIP.2014.7051626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper compares the rate-distortion-complexity (RDC) characteristics of the HEVC Main 10 Profile (M10P) and Main Profile (MP) encoders. The evaluations are performed with HEVC reference encoder (HM) whose M10P and MP are benchmarked with different resolutions, frame rates, and bit depths. The reported RD results are based on bit rate differences for equal PSNR whereas complexities have been profiled with Intel VTune on Intel Core 2 processor. With our 10-bit 4K 120 fps test set, the average bit rate decrements of M10P over MP are 5.8%, 11.6%, and 12.3% in the all-intra (AI), random access (RA), and low-delay B (LB) configurations, respectively. Decreasing the bit depth of this test set to 8 lowers the RD gain of Ml OP only slightly to 5.4% (AI), 11.4% (RA), and 12.1% (LB). The similar trend continues in all our tests even though the RD gain of M10P is decreased over MP with lower resolutions and frame rates. M10P introduces no computational overhead in HM, but it is anticipated to increase complexity and double the memory usage in practical encoders. Hence, the 10-bit HEVC encoding with 8-bit input video is the most recommended option if computation and memory resources are adequate for it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
8位和10位HEVC编码器的比较研究
本文比较了HEVC主配置文件(M10P)和主配置文件(MP)编码器的码率失真复杂度(RDC)特性。使用HEVC参考编码器(HM)进行评估,其M10P和MP以不同的分辨率,帧速率和位深度为基准。报告的RD结果是基于相同PSNR的比特率差异,而复杂性是在英特尔酷睿2处理器上使用英特尔VTune进行的。使用我们的10位4K 120 fps测试集,在全内(AI)、随机访问(RA)和低延迟B (LB)配置下,M10P比MP的平均比特率下降分别为5.8%、11.6%和12.3%。将该测试集的位深降低为8,Ml OP的RD增益仅略微降低至5.4% (AI), 11.4% (RA)和12.1% (LB)。在我们所有的测试中,尽管M10P的RD增益比分辨率和帧率较低的MP低,但类似的趋势仍在继续。M10P在HM中没有引入计算开销,但预计会增加复杂性,并使实际编码器的内存使用量增加一倍。因此,如果计算和内存资源足够的话,10位HEVC编码和8位输入视频是最推荐的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A joint 3D image semantic segmentation and scalable coding scheme with ROI approach Disocclusion hole-filling in DIBR-synthesized images using multi-scale template matching Rate-distortion optimised transform competition for intra coding in HEVC Robust image registration using adaptive expectation maximisation based PCA Non-separable mode dependent transforms for intra coding in HEVC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1