THE EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES IN MONTENEGRO: LEGE LATA AND EUROPEAN STANDARDS

Glasnik prava Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.46793/gp.1302.55a
M. Anđelić
{"title":"THE EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES IN MONTENEGRO: LEGE LATA AND EUROPEAN STANDARDS","authors":"M. Anđelić","doi":"10.46793/gp.1302.55a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper aims at reviewing the position of persons with disabilities in Montenegro within the context of the legislation reform necessitated by the need to harmonise the country’s legislation with the EU standards. In the Montenegrin legislation, a number of laws were passed that not only adequately protect the status of persons with disabilities, but also integrate a number of stimulating measures for employers that encourage the employment of persons with disabilities. However, the employment of people with disabilities seems to face a number of obstacles. Legislative imperfections become negligible in relation to problems related to the education of persons with disabilities, their agility, and certain problems regarding the willingness of employers to employ them. From the methodological aspect, a number of scientific methods of research and data processing were used in the work: - Historical-descriptive is important in order to see the development process of the protection of persons with disabilities in terms of appropriate legislation and measures that contribute to their employability;- Descriptive method is important when defining basic terms such as: disability, persons with disabilities and the like;- Quantitative analysis was used dominantly in the analysis of the representation of persons with disabilities in the total population, in the labor market, both in terms of the number of employed and unemployed; - The dogmatic method is used in the study of national rights, both in their entirety and in parts, but also in the study of the European legal framework; - Comparative analysis is important when comparing certain provisions in European legislation and national legislation;- The analysis method is used throughout the work, and it is used to analyze basic legal terms, positive law and statistical and other data; - The synthesis method is particularly important for determining conclusions and providing answers to the set goals of this research.","PeriodicalId":399228,"journal":{"name":"Glasnik prava","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glasnik prava","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46793/gp.1302.55a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper aims at reviewing the position of persons with disabilities in Montenegro within the context of the legislation reform necessitated by the need to harmonise the country’s legislation with the EU standards. In the Montenegrin legislation, a number of laws were passed that not only adequately protect the status of persons with disabilities, but also integrate a number of stimulating measures for employers that encourage the employment of persons with disabilities. However, the employment of people with disabilities seems to face a number of obstacles. Legislative imperfections become negligible in relation to problems related to the education of persons with disabilities, their agility, and certain problems regarding the willingness of employers to employ them. From the methodological aspect, a number of scientific methods of research and data processing were used in the work: - Historical-descriptive is important in order to see the development process of the protection of persons with disabilities in terms of appropriate legislation and measures that contribute to their employability;- Descriptive method is important when defining basic terms such as: disability, persons with disabilities and the like;- Quantitative analysis was used dominantly in the analysis of the representation of persons with disabilities in the total population, in the labor market, both in terms of the number of employed and unemployed; - The dogmatic method is used in the study of national rights, both in their entirety and in parts, but also in the study of the European legal framework; - Comparative analysis is important when comparing certain provisions in European legislation and national legislation;- The analysis method is used throughout the work, and it is used to analyze basic legal terms, positive law and statistical and other data; - The synthesis method is particularly important for determining conclusions and providing answers to the set goals of this research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黑山残疾人的教育和就业:拉脱维亚法律和欧洲标准
本文的目的是在立法改革的背景下审查黑山残疾人的地位,因为需要使该国的立法与欧盟标准保持一致。在黑山的立法中,通过了一些法律,这些法律不仅充分保护残疾人的地位,而且还纳入了一些鼓励雇主雇用残疾人的激励措施。然而,残疾人的就业似乎面临着一些障碍。在与残疾人的教育、残疾人的灵活性以及雇主雇用残疾人的意愿有关的某些问题方面,立法上的不完善可以忽略不计。在方法方面,工作中使用了一些科学的研究和数据处理方法:-历史描述性方法很重要,以便从有助于残疾人就业的适当立法和措施方面看到保护残疾人的发展过程;-描述性方法在定义基本术语时很重要,例如:残疾、残疾人等;-在分析残疾人在总人口和劳动力市场中的代表性时,主要采用了定量分析,包括就业和失业人数;-在研究全部和部分国家权利时,以及在研究欧洲法律框架时,都采用了教条式的方法;-在比较欧洲立法和国家立法中的某些规定时,比较分析很重要;-分析方法贯穿于整个工作,用于分析基本法律术语、成文法和统计等数据;-综合方法对于确定结论和为本研究的既定目标提供答案尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES IN MONTENEGRO: LEGE LATA AND EUROPEAN STANDARDS NABAVLjANjE, DRŽANjE I NOŠENjE ORUŽJA PO ZAKONU O ORUŽJU I MUNICIJI U REPUBLICI SRBIJI LJUDSKA PRAVA NA RADNOM MJESTU – PRAVO NA PRIVATNOST VIŠESTRUKI POVRAT U POZITIVNOM KRIVIČNOM ZAKONODAVSTVU PRAVNA DRŽAVA I MEDIJI – KANONI MEDIJSKOG PRAVA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1