Problems of the Counter Claim Institution in an Arbitral Procedure

Anna F. Mescheryakova
{"title":"Problems of the Counter Claim Institution in an Arbitral Procedure","authors":"Anna F. Mescheryakova","doi":"10.18572/1812-383x-2022-1-14-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the study of the institution of counterclaim in the arbitration process. The problems that arbitration courts face when deciding whether to accept a counterclaim and consider it are analyzed. Special attention is paid to the correlation of the terms of possible counterclaim with the terms of consideration of the case and the abuse of the right to file a counterclaim. Practical recommendations have been developed to address the gaps in the legal regulation of these issues.","PeriodicalId":254727,"journal":{"name":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2022-1-14-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the institution of counterclaim in the arbitration process. The problems that arbitration courts face when deciding whether to accept a counterclaim and consider it are analyzed. Special attention is paid to the correlation of the terms of possible counterclaim with the terms of consideration of the case and the abuse of the right to file a counterclaim. Practical recommendations have been developed to address the gaps in the legal regulation of these issues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反请求制度在仲裁程序中的若干问题
本文对仲裁程序中的反诉制度进行了研究。分析了仲裁法院在决定是否接受反诉并予以考虑时所面临的问题。特别注意可能提出反诉的条件与案件的审议条件之间的关系,以及提出反诉的权利的滥用。已经提出了切实可行的建议,以解决对这些问题的法律管制方面的空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abuse of Law in the Area of Insolvency (Bankruptcy) On the Need for the Unification of Provisions of the Institution of Parties to a Case in Procedural Branches of Russian Law Aims of the Civil Procedure in Russia and France: Common Features and Differences Problems of the Counter Claim Institution in an Arbitral Procedure Collective litigation in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1