Is there any difference in cardiogoniometry parameters of ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy in patients with left bundle branch block?

A. Sadeghpour, A. Alizadehasl, A. Diz, M. Akbarzadeh, N. Rezaeian, Mahbubeh Zeighami, A. Hashemi
{"title":"Is there any difference in cardiogoniometry parameters of ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy in patients with left bundle branch block?","authors":"A. Sadeghpour, A. Alizadehasl, A. Diz, M. Akbarzadeh, N. Rezaeian, Mahbubeh Zeighami, A. Hashemi","doi":"10.5812/acvi.22903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Differentiating ischemic from nonischemic cardiomyopathy is important both prognostically and therapeutically, although it may be difficult clinically. Objectives: We aimed to determine the diagnostic power of Cardiogoniometry (CGM) in the differentiation of the ischemic from the nonischemic etiology of left bundle branch block (LBBB). Patients and Methods: We studied 37 patients with LBBB on the electrocardiogram (ECG) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <30%. All of them underwent coronary angiography, and 33 patients were included. Eighteen patients were categorized as the ischemic cardiomyopathy group, and 15 patients with normal coronary angiography were assigned to the nonischemic cardiomyopathy group. Then, CGM parameters were studied and compared between the two groups. Results: Both ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy groups were similar in age, LVEF, weight, height, and body mass index. Interestingly, there were no significant differences in the average value of the 40 CGM parameters that were analyzed in this study between the two study groups. Conclusions: When LBBB is the underlying rhythm, CGM cannot differentiate ischemic from nonischemic patients with good accuracy. Large studies, however, are needed to confirm our results.","PeriodicalId":429543,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/acvi.22903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Differentiating ischemic from nonischemic cardiomyopathy is important both prognostically and therapeutically, although it may be difficult clinically. Objectives: We aimed to determine the diagnostic power of Cardiogoniometry (CGM) in the differentiation of the ischemic from the nonischemic etiology of left bundle branch block (LBBB). Patients and Methods: We studied 37 patients with LBBB on the electrocardiogram (ECG) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <30%. All of them underwent coronary angiography, and 33 patients were included. Eighteen patients were categorized as the ischemic cardiomyopathy group, and 15 patients with normal coronary angiography were assigned to the nonischemic cardiomyopathy group. Then, CGM parameters were studied and compared between the two groups. Results: Both ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy groups were similar in age, LVEF, weight, height, and body mass index. Interestingly, there were no significant differences in the average value of the 40 CGM parameters that were analyzed in this study between the two study groups. Conclusions: When LBBB is the underlying rhythm, CGM cannot differentiate ischemic from nonischemic patients with good accuracy. Large studies, however, are needed to confirm our results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
左束支传导阻滞患者缺血性和非缺血性心肌病的心电测量参数是否有差异?
背景:区分缺血性和非缺血性心肌病在预后和治疗上都很重要,尽管在临床上可能很困难。目的:探讨心肌测量(CGM)对左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)缺血性与非缺血性病因的鉴别诊断价值。患者与方法:我们研究了37例左室射血分数(LVEF) <30%且心电图显示为LBBB的患者。所有患者均行冠状动脉造影,纳入33例患者。18例患者被分为缺血性心肌病组,15例冠状动脉造影正常的患者被分为非缺血性心肌病组。然后对两组的CGM参数进行研究和比较。结果:缺血性和非缺血性心肌病组在年龄、LVEF、体重、身高和体重指数方面相似。有趣的是,在本研究中分析的40个CGM参数的平均值在两个研究组之间没有显著差异。结论:当LBBB为基础节律时,CGM不能很好地区分缺血性和非缺血性患者。然而,需要大量的研究来证实我们的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Noninvasive Assessment of Coronary Flow Reserve Before and After Ranolazine Administration: Does It Improve in Our Real Patients? Postpartum Inverted Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy After Intravenous Atropine Administration Heart Failure in a Case of Inverted Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy due to Cocaine and Methamphetamine Abuse Treated with Levosimendan Strain Echocardiography Immediately Before Acute Left Ventricular Rupture Following Anterior Wall Myocardial Infarction Isolated congenital left ventricular diverticula: A rare cardiac anomaly
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1