The Dialogue between the ECHR and the Italian Constitutional Court: The Saga of 'Giem and Others V Italy

I. Motoc, Markos Volikas
{"title":"The Dialogue between the ECHR and the Italian Constitutional Court: The Saga of 'Giem and Others V Italy","authors":"I. Motoc, Markos Volikas","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3336144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following a series of cases brought against Italy in relation to non-conviction based confiscation, the European Court of Human Rights engaged in a judicial dialogue with the Italian Constitutional Court over the correct interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights and in particular Article 7. This article elaborates on the background of this dialogue and analyses the European Court's position in its most recent judgement in this saga: GIEM and Others v Italy.","PeriodicalId":423701,"journal":{"name":"AARN: International Law (Topic)","volume":"302 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AARN: International Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3336144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Following a series of cases brought against Italy in relation to non-conviction based confiscation, the European Court of Human Rights engaged in a judicial dialogue with the Italian Constitutional Court over the correct interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights and in particular Article 7. This article elaborates on the background of this dialogue and analyses the European Court's position in its most recent judgement in this saga: GIEM and Others v Italy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲人权法院与意大利宪法法院之间的对话:“Giem和其他人诉意大利”的传奇
在对意大利提出一系列关于无定罪没收的案件之后,欧洲人权法院与意大利宪法法院就如何正确解释《欧洲人权公约》,特别是第7条进行了司法对话。本文详细阐述了这一对话的背景,并分析了欧洲法院在其最近的判决中的立场:GIEM和其他人诉意大利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Export Credit Agencies: Fossil Fuel Exclusion Policies, Paris Alignment, and Role as Transformational Actors International Investment Agreements and Investor-State Arbitration in Asia Technology Transfer under China’s Foreign Investment Regime: Does the WTO Provide a Solution? A European Social Semester? The European Pillar of Social Rights in practice A New Chinese Economic Order?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1