STATUS OF REFORMATIVE PUNISHMENTS IN INDIA

Arghyadip Sen
{"title":"STATUS OF REFORMATIVE PUNISHMENTS IN INDIA","authors":"Arghyadip Sen","doi":"10.59126/v2i2a7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Of all parts of the law, the branch that intently concern or contacts an individual in his everyday existence is criminal law. Wrongdoing could likewise be characterized as the commission of acts precluded by corrective law and hoodlums as people who carry out such demonstrations. The penalization framework is an indispensable piece of law enforcement and for keeping up with Government backed retirement. The advancement of progress has come about through the change in the theory, strategy, and intention of penalization. Discipline might be utilized as an approach to decreasing the occurrence of criminal ways of behaving either by hindering the expected guilty parties or by impairing and keeping them from rehashing the offense or by improving them into law-withstanding residents. In this manner, speculations of discipline contain strategies concerning the treatment of wrongdoing and hoodlums. They're ordered into four sorts. Every one of these aren't correspondingly elite and every one of them assumes a vital part in dealing with possible wrongdoers. The hypotheses of discipline are Retributive theory, Deterrent theory, Preventive theory, and Reformative theory. This review is in regard to reformative theory and dissecting the status in India.","PeriodicalId":424180,"journal":{"name":"THE JOURNAL OF UNIQUE LAWS AND STUDENTS","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THE JOURNAL OF UNIQUE LAWS AND STUDENTS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59126/v2i2a7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Of all parts of the law, the branch that intently concern or contacts an individual in his everyday existence is criminal law. Wrongdoing could likewise be characterized as the commission of acts precluded by corrective law and hoodlums as people who carry out such demonstrations. The penalization framework is an indispensable piece of law enforcement and for keeping up with Government backed retirement. The advancement of progress has come about through the change in the theory, strategy, and intention of penalization. Discipline might be utilized as an approach to decreasing the occurrence of criminal ways of behaving either by hindering the expected guilty parties or by impairing and keeping them from rehashing the offense or by improving them into law-withstanding residents. In this manner, speculations of discipline contain strategies concerning the treatment of wrongdoing and hoodlums. They're ordered into four sorts. Every one of these aren't correspondingly elite and every one of them assumes a vital part in dealing with possible wrongdoers. The hypotheses of discipline are Retributive theory, Deterrent theory, Preventive theory, and Reformative theory. This review is in regard to reformative theory and dissecting the status in India.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改革刑罚在印度的现状
在法律的所有部分中,与个人的日常生活密切相关或联系的部分是刑法。不法行为同样可以被定性为实施矫正法所禁止的行为,而暴徒则是进行这种示威的人。惩罚框架是执法和与政府支持的退休保持同步的一个不可缺少的部分。这种进步是通过刑罚理论、刑罚策略和刑罚意图的变化来实现的。纪律可以作为一种方法来减少犯罪行为的发生,或者通过阻碍预期的犯罪方,或者通过削弱和阻止他们再次犯罪,或者通过将他们改善为守法的居民。以这种方式,对纪律的推测包含了处理不法行为和暴徒的策略。它们被分为四类。他们中的每一个人都不是精英,他们中的每一个人在处理可能的不法行为时都扮演着至关重要的角色。惩戒的假说有报应论、威慑论、预防论和改良论。本文从改革理论出发,剖析改革在印度的现状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN INDIA: CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS AND IMPLICATIONS ON MODERN ISSUES JUDICIAL REVIEW: EXPLORING THE ROLE OF JUDICIARY IN CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATIONS DUE PROCESS: EVALUATING ITS APPLICATION IN CRIMINAL AND CIVIL PROCEEDINGS FUTURE OF BLOCKCHAIN GOVERNANCE: EXPLORING DECENTRALIZED DEMOCRACY DATA PROTECTION AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: THE INTERSECTION OF PRIVACY AND INFORMATION SECURITY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1