Single cephalic vein as the only draining vein of radial forearm free flap: A comparative study of 154 cases

Nilamani Mohanty, B. Nayak
{"title":"Single cephalic vein as the only draining vein of radial forearm free flap: A comparative study of 154 cases","authors":"Nilamani Mohanty, B. Nayak","doi":"10.4103/0794-9316.178454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Radial forearm free flap is the work horse in head and neck reconstruction. The venous drainage of the flap is by both superficial and deep group of veins. Aim of the Study: To compare the efficacy of venous drainage by single superficial vein (cephalic vein) with dual vein (cephalic vein & venae comitantes) in radial forearm free flaps and its impact on flap survival. Patient and methods- A total of 154 patients undergoing radial forearm free flap for reconstruction following resections of head and neck cancer were studied prospectively . In group 1 (75 cases) only cephalic vein was used as the draining vein and in Group 2 (79 cases) both cephalic vein & one venaecomitantes were used as the draining vein. Patients with non availability of cephalic vein as a result of chemotherapy or injury were excluded from the study. Data were retrieved frompatients' files and analyzed using SPSS computer software version 15.0. Observation and Results: The flap survival rate was 97.33% (73/75) in Group 1 versus 98.73% (78/79) in Group 2. The result is analysed statistically by using SPSS computer software version 15.0. and the P value > 0.50 (c2 with Yates' correction=0.00206555, df=1) stastically not significant. Conclusion: Though two vein anastomosis may provide a more fail safe theoretical advantage, single superficial vein (Cephalic) provides effective and adequate drainage with less operative time and no additional morbidity.","PeriodicalId":325435,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Plastic Surgery","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0794-9316.178454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Radial forearm free flap is the work horse in head and neck reconstruction. The venous drainage of the flap is by both superficial and deep group of veins. Aim of the Study: To compare the efficacy of venous drainage by single superficial vein (cephalic vein) with dual vein (cephalic vein & venae comitantes) in radial forearm free flaps and its impact on flap survival. Patient and methods- A total of 154 patients undergoing radial forearm free flap for reconstruction following resections of head and neck cancer were studied prospectively . In group 1 (75 cases) only cephalic vein was used as the draining vein and in Group 2 (79 cases) both cephalic vein & one venaecomitantes were used as the draining vein. Patients with non availability of cephalic vein as a result of chemotherapy or injury were excluded from the study. Data were retrieved frompatients' files and analyzed using SPSS computer software version 15.0. Observation and Results: The flap survival rate was 97.33% (73/75) in Group 1 versus 98.73% (78/79) in Group 2. The result is analysed statistically by using SPSS computer software version 15.0. and the P value > 0.50 (c2 with Yates' correction=0.00206555, df=1) stastically not significant. Conclusion: Though two vein anastomosis may provide a more fail safe theoretical advantage, single superficial vein (Cephalic) provides effective and adequate drainage with less operative time and no additional morbidity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单头静脉作为前臂桡骨游离皮瓣唯一引流静脉154例的比较研究
背景:桡骨前臂游离皮瓣是头颈部重建的主力神。皮瓣的静脉引流有浅静脉组和深静脉组。目的:比较单浅静脉(头静脉)引流与双浅静脉(头静脉+伴静脉)引流在前臂桡骨游离皮瓣中的效果及对皮瓣存活的影响。患者和方法:对154例头颈癌切除术后行前臂游离皮瓣重建的患者进行了前瞻性研究。第1组(75例)仅采用头静脉作为引流静脉,第2组(79例)同时采用头静脉和单支静脉作为引流静脉。由于化疗或损伤而无法获得头静脉的患者被排除在研究之外。数据从患者档案中检索,并使用SPSS 15.0版计算机软件进行分析。观察与结果:1组皮瓣成活率为97.33%(73/75),2组为98.73%(78/79)。采用SPSS 15.0软件对结果进行统计分析。P值> 0.50 (c2与Yates校正=0.00206555,df=1),统计学上不显著。结论:虽然两静脉吻合术在理论上可能提供更安全的优势,但单浅表静脉(头侧)提供有效和充分的引流,手术时间短,无额外并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A case of aplasia cutis type VI (Bart’s syndrome) at University of Abuja Teaching Hospital Gwagwalada, Abuja, Nigeria A prospective randomized comparative study of facial scar modulation using topical silicone gel versus coconut oil Tessier 4 right-sided orofacial cleft deformity with associated congenital limb anomalies − a case report and literature review Penile and scrotal defects post-Fournier gangrene: reconstructive options and challenges in resource limited settings Ectrodactyly or lobster claw feet: our surgical experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1