Exploring the concept of “knowledge sabotage”

Alberto Ferraris, Francesco Antonio Perotti
{"title":"Exploring the concept of “knowledge sabotage”","authors":"Alberto Ferraris, Francesco Antonio Perotti","doi":"10.1109/ICTMOD49425.2020.9380604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this short paper is to build theory and to stimulate further research on knowledge sabotage, the most extreme counterproductive behavior that hinders knowledge sharing. Following a comprehensive analysis of the literature, we identified nine original conceptual propositions which shape an innovative framework of individual-, group- and organizational-level factors. The proposed framework offers the key factors that are relevant for a better conceptualization of knowledge sabotage, thus representing a fertile ground for new empirical studies. Since the recent formalization of the \"sabotage\" of knowledge, this paper is the first that presents such influencing factors thus opening the way for a better understanding of the dynamics that inhibit knowledge sharing.","PeriodicalId":158303,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions (ICTMOD)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions (ICTMOD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTMOD49425.2020.9380604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The purpose of this short paper is to build theory and to stimulate further research on knowledge sabotage, the most extreme counterproductive behavior that hinders knowledge sharing. Following a comprehensive analysis of the literature, we identified nine original conceptual propositions which shape an innovative framework of individual-, group- and organizational-level factors. The proposed framework offers the key factors that are relevant for a better conceptualization of knowledge sabotage, thus representing a fertile ground for new empirical studies. Since the recent formalization of the "sabotage" of knowledge, this paper is the first that presents such influencing factors thus opening the way for a better understanding of the dynamics that inhibit knowledge sharing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“知识破坏”概念探析
这篇短文的目的是建立理论,并促进对知识破坏的进一步研究,知识破坏是阻碍知识共享的最极端的反生产行为。在对文献进行全面分析之后,我们确定了九个原始的概念命题,它们形成了个人、群体和组织层面因素的创新框架。提出的框架提供了与更好地概念化知识破坏相关的关键因素,从而为新的实证研究提供了肥沃的土壤。自从最近对知识“破坏”的形式化以来,本文首次提出了这种影响因素,从而为更好地理解抑制知识共享的动态开辟了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital transformation of Human Resources Management: A Roadmap Sharing Economy in a context of pandemic propagation : Case of the COVID19 The Two Phases Method for operating rooms planning and scheduling Exploring the concept of “knowledge sabotage” A Hierarchical Blockchain of Things Network For Unified Carbon Emission Trading (HBUETS):A Conceptual Framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1