Temos Sido Transparentes o Suficiente? Desafios à Replicabilidade e à Credibilidade da Pesquisa na Área de Negócios

Wesley Mendes-da-Silva
{"title":"Temos Sido Transparentes o Suficiente? Desafios à Replicabilidade e à Credibilidade da Pesquisa na Área de Negócios","authors":"Wesley Mendes-da-Silva","doi":"10.1590/1982-7849RAC2019190306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Science should be ‘show me’, not ‘trust me’!” Through this phrase, Stark (2018, 613) discusses the need to repeat scientific studies to confer robustness to research results. The replicability of works is viewed as the golden standard for scientific research, given that transparency is the central requisite needed to replicate or reproduce studies. (Janz, 2015; Marques, 2019). Therefore, transparency in business studies is something that is crucial to their credibility, and it also has various impacts, as noted by The Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA - https://sfdora.org/), and Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE - https://publicationethics.org/data) (Mendes-Da-Silva, 2018). But, how many of us have assured the transparency of our research results, by sharing data, materials, and/or code (duly commented) used in qualitative, statistical or econometric analyses (Gandrud, 2018)?","PeriodicalId":429649,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Administração Contemporânea","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Administração Contemporânea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849RAC2019190306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

“Science should be ‘show me’, not ‘trust me’!” Through this phrase, Stark (2018, 613) discusses the need to repeat scientific studies to confer robustness to research results. The replicability of works is viewed as the golden standard for scientific research, given that transparency is the central requisite needed to replicate or reproduce studies. (Janz, 2015; Marques, 2019). Therefore, transparency in business studies is something that is crucial to their credibility, and it also has various impacts, as noted by The Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA - https://sfdora.org/), and Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE - https://publicationethics.org/data) (Mendes-Da-Silva, 2018). But, how many of us have assured the transparency of our research results, by sharing data, materials, and/or code (duly commented) used in qualitative, statistical or econometric analyses (Gandrud, 2018)?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们是否足够透明?商业研究的可复制性和可信度面临的挑战
“科学应该是‘展示给我看’,而不是‘相信我’!”通过这句话,Stark(2018,613)讨论了重复科学研究以赋予研究结果稳健性的必要性。工作的可复制性被视为科学研究的黄金标准,因为透明度是复制或再现研究的核心必要条件。(Janz, 2015;品牌,2019)。因此,商业研究的透明度对其可信度至关重要,正如《研究评估宣言》(DORA - https://sfdora.org/)和出版伦理委员会(COPE - https://publicationethics.org/data)所指出的那样,它也有各种影响(Mendes-Da-Silva, 2018)。但是,我们中有多少人通过共享定性、统计或计量经济学分析中使用的数据、材料和/或代码(适当注释)来确保研究结果的透明度(Gandrud, 2018)?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Compreendendo a Conspicuidade na Divulgação das Experiências nas Redes Sociais: O Efeito do Materialismo Standard Jones and Modified Jones: An Earnings Management Tutorial Drivers for Teleconsultation Acceptance in Brazil: Patients’ Perspective during the COVID-19 Pandemic Uncertainty of Claims Provisions from the Analysis of Financial Statements Response Surface Analysis: A Tutorial for Examining Linear and Curvilinear Effects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1