From social enterprises to impact businesses: Examining the theoretical debate toward social innovation

G. D. Alperstedt, Carolina Andion, Priscila Keller Pires
{"title":"From social enterprises to impact businesses: Examining the theoretical debate toward social innovation","authors":"G. D. Alperstedt, Carolina Andion, Priscila Keller Pires","doi":"10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: provide a critical examination of existing theoretical models and their disagreements that arise from divergent political views, imbued with value about what the social is, what is good and what is bad. Methodology/Approach: theoretical essay that examines, on the one hand, the theoretical discussion that encompasses models with different logics and organizational formats, with an emphasis on prescriptive approaches that romanticize this type of enterprise and, on the other hand, critical approaches that interpret the debate not as a rupture, but as a legitimizing and reproducing character of the established social order. Main results: the visions about social enterprises, divergent in many of the existing theoretical models, shift attention from socio-environmental problems by focusing on heroic individuals and miraculous “solutions”. Social innovation would be the way to solve the impasse of how social transformations are generated in practice, involving different actors that go beyond the discussion in question, directing the debate to the notion of social innovation ecosystems. Theoretical/methodological contributions: propose an inclusive framework that involves the acceptance of diversity and pluralism, and that goes beyond the dispute between models, in order to allow greater focus on socio-environmental issues, recognizing the importance of collective approaches, socio-historical, cultural and territorial differences, in addition to hosting multiscale and multisectoral studies in the direction of social innovation as a transforming process. Relevance/originality: The article expands the understanding of the characteristics and typologies of social enterprises and their different interpretations, leading to reflection on their practices and advancing in the study of the real consequences that these organizations promote, bringing to the fore the debate on social innovation as focus. Social contributions: by discussing the practical consequences of social enterprises and bringing to light the social innovations that these actors co-produce in their specific realities, the article sheds light on this broader dimension directed to the serious problems experienced today.","PeriodicalId":356018,"journal":{"name":"REGEPE Entrepreneurship and Small Business Journal","volume":"182 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REGEPE Entrepreneurship and Small Business Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: provide a critical examination of existing theoretical models and their disagreements that arise from divergent political views, imbued with value about what the social is, what is good and what is bad. Methodology/Approach: theoretical essay that examines, on the one hand, the theoretical discussion that encompasses models with different logics and organizational formats, with an emphasis on prescriptive approaches that romanticize this type of enterprise and, on the other hand, critical approaches that interpret the debate not as a rupture, but as a legitimizing and reproducing character of the established social order. Main results: the visions about social enterprises, divergent in many of the existing theoretical models, shift attention from socio-environmental problems by focusing on heroic individuals and miraculous “solutions”. Social innovation would be the way to solve the impasse of how social transformations are generated in practice, involving different actors that go beyond the discussion in question, directing the debate to the notion of social innovation ecosystems. Theoretical/methodological contributions: propose an inclusive framework that involves the acceptance of diversity and pluralism, and that goes beyond the dispute between models, in order to allow greater focus on socio-environmental issues, recognizing the importance of collective approaches, socio-historical, cultural and territorial differences, in addition to hosting multiscale and multisectoral studies in the direction of social innovation as a transforming process. Relevance/originality: The article expands the understanding of the characteristics and typologies of social enterprises and their different interpretations, leading to reflection on their practices and advancing in the study of the real consequences that these organizations promote, bringing to the fore the debate on social innovation as focus. Social contributions: by discussing the practical consequences of social enterprises and bringing to light the social innovations that these actors co-produce in their specific realities, the article sheds light on this broader dimension directed to the serious problems experienced today.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从社会企业到影响型企业:考察社会创新的理论争论
目标:对现有理论模型及其分歧进行批判性检查,这些分歧源于不同的政治观点,充满了关于社会是什么,什么是好,什么是坏的价值。方法论/途径:一篇理论论文,一方面考察包含不同逻辑和组织形式的模型的理论讨论,强调将这种类型的企业浪漫化的规范性方法,另一方面,批判性方法将辩论解释为不是破裂,而是作为既定社会秩序的合法化和再生产特征。主要结果:社会企业的愿景与现有的许多理论模型存在分歧,将注意力从社会环境问题转移到英雄个人和奇迹般的“解决方案”上。社会创新将是解决社会转型如何在实践中产生的僵局的方法,涉及不同的参与者,这些参与者超越了所讨论的问题,将辩论引向社会创新生态系统的概念。理论/方法贡献:提出一个包容的框架,包括接受多样性和多元主义,超越模型之间的争议,以便更多地关注社会环境问题,认识到集体方法、社会历史、文化和地域差异的重要性,以及在社会创新的方向上进行多尺度和多部门的研究作为一个转变过程。相关性/原创性:本文拓展了对社会企业的特征、类型及其不同解读的理解,引发了对社会企业实践的反思,推进了对社会企业所推动的真实后果的研究,将社会创新作为焦点的争论推向了前沿。社会贡献:通过讨论社会企业的实际后果,并揭示这些行动者在其具体现实中共同产生的社会创新,本文揭示了针对今天所经历的严重问题的更广泛的维度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Portugal, ora pois! Estratégias de internacionalização de uma empresa familiar de pequeno porte Portugal, ora pois! Estratégias de internacionalização de uma empresa familiar de pequeno porte Portugal, ora pois! Internationalization strategies of a small family business Portugal, ora pois! Internationalization strategies of a small family business Analysis of the capital structure of startups in light of the tradeoff and pecking Order theories
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1