The third-century ‘crisis’ (c. AD 250–70)

D. Perring
{"title":"The third-century ‘crisis’ (c. AD 250–70)","authors":"D. Perring","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198789000.003.0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"London’s port was abandoned in the mid-third century and its waterfront quays dismantled in changes that cast important new light on the problems of the third century. This chapter sets out the detail of the redundancy of London’s port and reviews arguments that might explain it. It does so by establishing a chronology that suggests that the port ceased to function effectively c. AD 255, and that the waterfront was crudely refashioned into a bank at some point in the 260s. This redundancy followed a rapid decline in the volume of goods being traded over longer-distances, and is argued to have been the consequence of a revised policy with regard to annona. The Thames may also have ceased to be tidal at this time, contributing to the redundancy of the port but not explaining the speed of its dereliction and destruction. Further light obtains from a study of the failure and abandonment of sites associated with Wealden iron production. An explanation is proposed: involving a loss of military manpower and naval capacity, possibly provoked by the epidemic of the 250s known as the plague of Cyprian and compounded by military failure and barbarian threat. Rome’s loss of control over its coastal waters and rising Frankish piracy at the time of the Gallic Empire might explain why ships ceased to dock at London’s quays, which were dismantled to defend the riverside.","PeriodicalId":293911,"journal":{"name":"London in the Roman World","volume":"145 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"London in the Roman World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198789000.003.0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

London’s port was abandoned in the mid-third century and its waterfront quays dismantled in changes that cast important new light on the problems of the third century. This chapter sets out the detail of the redundancy of London’s port and reviews arguments that might explain it. It does so by establishing a chronology that suggests that the port ceased to function effectively c. AD 255, and that the waterfront was crudely refashioned into a bank at some point in the 260s. This redundancy followed a rapid decline in the volume of goods being traded over longer-distances, and is argued to have been the consequence of a revised policy with regard to annona. The Thames may also have ceased to be tidal at this time, contributing to the redundancy of the port but not explaining the speed of its dereliction and destruction. Further light obtains from a study of the failure and abandonment of sites associated with Wealden iron production. An explanation is proposed: involving a loss of military manpower and naval capacity, possibly provoked by the epidemic of the 250s known as the plague of Cyprian and compounded by military failure and barbarian threat. Rome’s loss of control over its coastal waters and rising Frankish piracy at the time of the Gallic Empire might explain why ships ceased to dock at London’s quays, which were dismantled to defend the riverside.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三世纪的“危机”(约公元250-70年)
伦敦的港口在三世纪中叶被废弃,其滨水码头在变革中被拆除,这些变革为三世纪的问题提供了重要的新视角。本章列出了伦敦港口冗余的细节,并回顾了可能解释这一现象的论据。它建立了一个年表,表明港口在公元255年左右停止有效运作,而滨水区在260年代的某个时候被粗糙地改造成一个银行。这种冗余是由于长距离贸易的货物数量迅速下降造成的,有人认为这是关于空运的修订政策的结果。泰晤士河也可能在这个时候不再有潮汐,这有助于港口的冗余,但不能解释其被遗弃和破坏的速度。从对与威尔登铁生产有关的地点的失败和废弃的研究中得到进一步的启示。有人提出一种解释:涉及军事人力和海军能力的损失,可能是由250年代被称为塞浦路斯瘟疫的流行病引起的,再加上军事失败和野蛮人的威胁。在高卢帝国时期,罗马失去了对沿海水域的控制,加上法兰克海盗的猖獗,这或许可以解释为什么船只不再停靠伦敦的码头,为了保卫河滨,伦敦的码头被拆除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Post-war reconstruction (c. AD 61–70) Shaping the city (c. AD 52–60) Augusta (c. AD 350–80) The third-century ‘crisis’ (c. AD 250–70) The great forum (c. AD 110–25)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1