‘Who the hell’s defending if they’re going to walk out of here?’ The Moss Side Defence Committee

Simon Peplow
{"title":"‘Who the hell’s defending if they’re going to walk out of here?’ The Moss Side Defence Committee","authors":"Simon Peplow","doi":"10.7228/manchester/9781526125286.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter provides detailed discussion of the Moss Side Defence Committee, through local and understudied national records and original interviews, which is often overlooked in discussions of 1980–1. The Defence Committee, formed to aid those arrested in relation to the disturbances, vehemently opposed the Greater Manchester County Council-established local inquiry into the Moss Side disturbances, and organised a boycott. It was later suggested that dichotomous local responses to state mechanisms allowed progress: that radical groups, such as the Defence Committee, ‘being noisy’ allowed moderates previously unattainable access to the authorities – but the extent to which this was a conscious tactic is debatable. The chapter ends by exploring unstudied interviews with residents and inquiry proceedings, demonstrating the high level of accusations of police misconduct not appearing in the inquiry report, and the continued discontent created by such exclusions.","PeriodicalId":275693,"journal":{"name":"Race and riots in Thatcher's Britain","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Race and riots in Thatcher's Britain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9781526125286.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter provides detailed discussion of the Moss Side Defence Committee, through local and understudied national records and original interviews, which is often overlooked in discussions of 1980–1. The Defence Committee, formed to aid those arrested in relation to the disturbances, vehemently opposed the Greater Manchester County Council-established local inquiry into the Moss Side disturbances, and organised a boycott. It was later suggested that dichotomous local responses to state mechanisms allowed progress: that radical groups, such as the Defence Committee, ‘being noisy’ allowed moderates previously unattainable access to the authorities – but the extent to which this was a conscious tactic is debatable. The chapter ends by exploring unstudied interviews with residents and inquiry proceedings, demonstrating the high level of accusations of police misconduct not appearing in the inquiry report, and the continued discontent created by such exclusions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“如果他们要离开这里,谁来为他们辩护?”“莫斯边防御委员会
本章通过当地和未充分研究的国家记录和原始访谈提供了对Moss Side防御委员会的详细讨论,这些在1980-1年的讨论中经常被忽视。防卫委员会的成立是为了帮助那些与骚乱有关的被捕者,他们强烈反对大曼彻斯特郡议会对莫斯赛德骚乱进行的地方调查,并组织了抵制活动。后来有人提出,地方对国家机制的两分法反应促进了进步:激进组织,如国防委员会,“吵闹”让温和派得以接近当局——但这在多大程度上是一种有意识的策略是有争议的。本章最后探讨了未经研究的居民访谈和调查程序,展示了调查报告中没有出现的对警察不当行为的高水平指控,以及这种排除所造成的持续不满。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
‘Who the hell’s defending if they’re going to walk out of here?’ The Moss Side Defence Committee Epilogue: ‘Turning point’ or ‘opportunity lost’? The legacy of 1980–81 A ‘conspicuous success’? Policing Liverpool and Manchester in July 1981 ‘The Brixton Defence Campaign says boycott the Scarman Inquiry’ ‘No other way to make their points of view known’? St Pauls, Bristol, 2 April 1980
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1