Energy efficient line-of-sight millimeter wave small cell backhaul: 60, 70, 80 or 140 GHz?

A. Mesodiakaki, A. Kassler, E. Zola, M. Ferndahl, T. Cai
{"title":"Energy efficient line-of-sight millimeter wave small cell backhaul: 60, 70, 80 or 140 GHz?","authors":"A. Mesodiakaki, A. Kassler, E. Zola, M. Ferndahl, T. Cai","doi":"10.1109/WoWMoM.2016.7523521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spectrum scarcity together with high capacity demands make the use of millimeter wave (mmWave) frequencies an interesting alternative for next generation, i.e., fifth generation (5G), networks. Although mmWave is expected to play a key role for both access network and backhaul (BH), its initial use in the BH network seems more straight-forward. This stems from the fact that, in the BH case, its deployment is less challenging due to the fixed locations of BH transceivers. Still, provided that mmWave spectrum consists of several subbands, each one with different characteristics and thus different deployment constraints (e.g., channel bandwidth, maximum transmission power), a comparison is required in order to gain a better insight into the potentials of each solution. To that end, in this paper, the main mmWave candidate frequency bands are compared in terms of range, throughput and energy consumption. In our results, the bandwidth availability, the maximum transmission power as well as the antenna gains of each BH technology are taken into account, as defined by the Federal Communications Commission. The results are also compared with current industry-oriented state-of-the-art transceiver characteristics in order to gain further insights into the maximum achievable gains of each subband.","PeriodicalId":187747,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 17th International Symposium on A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 17th International Symposium on A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WoWMoM.2016.7523521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Spectrum scarcity together with high capacity demands make the use of millimeter wave (mmWave) frequencies an interesting alternative for next generation, i.e., fifth generation (5G), networks. Although mmWave is expected to play a key role for both access network and backhaul (BH), its initial use in the BH network seems more straight-forward. This stems from the fact that, in the BH case, its deployment is less challenging due to the fixed locations of BH transceivers. Still, provided that mmWave spectrum consists of several subbands, each one with different characteristics and thus different deployment constraints (e.g., channel bandwidth, maximum transmission power), a comparison is required in order to gain a better insight into the potentials of each solution. To that end, in this paper, the main mmWave candidate frequency bands are compared in terms of range, throughput and energy consumption. In our results, the bandwidth availability, the maximum transmission power as well as the antenna gains of each BH technology are taken into account, as defined by the Federal Communications Commission. The results are also compared with current industry-oriented state-of-the-art transceiver characteristics in order to gain further insights into the maximum achievable gains of each subband.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高效视距毫米波小蜂窝回程:60,70,80或140 GHz?
频谱稀缺和高容量需求使得使用毫米波(mmWave)频率成为下一代(即第五代(5G)网络的有趣替代方案。虽然毫米波预计将在接入网和回程(BH)中发挥关键作用,但它在BH网络中的最初用途似乎更为直接。这源于这样一个事实,即在BH的情况下,由于BH收发器的固定位置,其部署挑战性较小。尽管如此,假设毫米波频谱由几个子带组成,每个子带具有不同的特性,因此具有不同的部署约束(例如,信道带宽,最大发射功率),则需要进行比较,以便更好地了解每种解决方案的潜力。为此,在本文中,主要毫米波候选频段在范围,吞吐量和能耗方面进行了比较。在我们的结果中,考虑了联邦通信委员会定义的带宽可用性,最大传输功率以及每种BH技术的天线增益。结果还与当前面向行业的最先进的收发器特性进行了比较,以便进一步了解每个子带的最大可实现增益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experimental validations of bandwidth compressed multicarrier signals Asynchronous reputation systems in device-to-device ecosystems Measurement-based study on the influence of localization errors on estimated shadow correlations An autonomous diagnostic tool for the WirelessHART industrial standard Evaluation of the IEEE 802.11ah Restricted Access Window mechanism for dense IoT networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1