{"title":"Wojna na słowa z polityką i historią w tle – językowe aspekty słynnego sporu o Słowian","authors":"Barbara Jachym","doi":"10.15584/misroa.2022.43.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the linguistic analysis of the polemics conducted in the press by Józef Kostrzewski and Bolko von Richthofen in the interwar period. The scientific subject – the ethnogenesis of the Slavs – turned into a sharp political polemic. The set of analysed texts is an example of a discourse – a tangle of texts, thematically related, standing with each other and with the discourse in a complex relationship. The texts refer to each other through numerous quotations, paraphrases, references in the text and footnotes. Their analysis provided information about the image of us – Poles (Slavs) vs. they – Germans (Germani), we – Polish scientists vs. they – German researchers existing then, as well as information on language strategies used to create a specific image of oneself and the opponent. Since the controversy was conducted in public, it also affected the public perception of the discussed issue, while the socio-historical reality of the time also had an impact on the course of the debate. The closer the Second World War approached, the more heated the dispute became, and the more scientists moved away from the scientific problem and entered into sharp political polemics.","PeriodicalId":281758,"journal":{"name":"Materiały i Sprawozdania Rzeszowskiego Ośrodka Archeologicznego","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materiały i Sprawozdania Rzeszowskiego Ośrodka Archeologicznego","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15584/misroa.2022.43.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article is devoted to the linguistic analysis of the polemics conducted in the press by Józef Kostrzewski and Bolko von Richthofen in the interwar period. The scientific subject – the ethnogenesis of the Slavs – turned into a sharp political polemic. The set of analysed texts is an example of a discourse – a tangle of texts, thematically related, standing with each other and with the discourse in a complex relationship. The texts refer to each other through numerous quotations, paraphrases, references in the text and footnotes. Their analysis provided information about the image of us – Poles (Slavs) vs. they – Germans (Germani), we – Polish scientists vs. they – German researchers existing then, as well as information on language strategies used to create a specific image of oneself and the opponent. Since the controversy was conducted in public, it also affected the public perception of the discussed issue, while the socio-historical reality of the time also had an impact on the course of the debate. The closer the Second World War approached, the more heated the dispute became, and the more scientists moved away from the scientific problem and entered into sharp political polemics.
本文致力于对Józef Kostrzewski和Bolko von Richthofen在两次世界大战期间在新闻界进行的论战进行语言学分析。这个科学课题——斯拉夫人的民族起源——变成了一场尖锐的政治论战。这组被分析的文本是一个话语的例子——一堆文本,主题相关,彼此站在一起,与话语处于复杂的关系中。文本通过大量的引用、释义、文本中的参考和脚注相互引用。他们的分析提供了关于我们-波兰人(斯拉夫人)vs.他们-德国人(日耳曼人),我们-波兰科学家vs.他们-当时的德国研究人员的形象的信息,以及用于创建自己和对手特定形象的语言策略的信息。由于争论是公开进行的,它也影响了公众对所讨论问题的看法,而当时的社会历史现实也对辩论的过程产生了影响。第二次世界大战越临近,争论就越激烈,越来越多的科学家从科学问题转移到尖锐的政治争论中。