HOW IS THE QUALITY OF READING TEST ITEMS ON ENGLISH SUBJECT?

Yulia Agustina, N. Hayati, M. Nazri
{"title":"HOW IS THE QUALITY OF READING TEST ITEMS ON ENGLISH SUBJECT?","authors":"Yulia Agustina, N. Hayati, M. Nazri","doi":"10.56997/kurikula.v7i2.737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of the study is to ascertain the quality of the reading test items on English subject for the eighth students at SMPN 12 Tasikmalaya. Those items were analyzed based on difficulty level items, discrimination power, and distractor effectivity. This study employed descriptive quantitative. It is implemented to describe the quality of reading test item of eighth students of SMPN 12 Tasikmalaya. Whereas, quantitative data used as the data or information in the form of numerical data and analyzed it by using Item and Test Analysis (ITEMAN) program 3.0 version. The researchers had already conducted the study on reading in previous study, so in collecting the data, the researcher used the documentation. It used to know the quality of reading test items that had been made by the first researcher. The results showed that: 1) based on difficulty level of items indicated 14 (23%) items in easy, 32 (53%) items in medium, and 14 (23%) items in hard. Dealing to discrimination power of items, it showed that 51 (85%) items in very good, 5 (8%) in good, 0 (0%) in enough, and 4 (7%) in poor, must be discarded. Meanwhile, the distractor effectivity on reading test items on English subject of eighth students of SMPN 12 Tasikmalaya were: 44 (73%) items in function, 12 (420%) items in enough, 2 (7%) items in unfunctional, and 0 (0%) items in poor. Overall, the quality of reading test which had been made by the first researcher in previous study was in good quality.","PeriodicalId":228794,"journal":{"name":"Kurikula : Jurnal Pendidikan","volume":"171 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kurikula : Jurnal Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56997/kurikula.v7i2.737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of the study is to ascertain the quality of the reading test items on English subject for the eighth students at SMPN 12 Tasikmalaya. Those items were analyzed based on difficulty level items, discrimination power, and distractor effectivity. This study employed descriptive quantitative. It is implemented to describe the quality of reading test item of eighth students of SMPN 12 Tasikmalaya. Whereas, quantitative data used as the data or information in the form of numerical data and analyzed it by using Item and Test Analysis (ITEMAN) program 3.0 version. The researchers had already conducted the study on reading in previous study, so in collecting the data, the researcher used the documentation. It used to know the quality of reading test items that had been made by the first researcher. The results showed that: 1) based on difficulty level of items indicated 14 (23%) items in easy, 32 (53%) items in medium, and 14 (23%) items in hard. Dealing to discrimination power of items, it showed that 51 (85%) items in very good, 5 (8%) in good, 0 (0%) in enough, and 4 (7%) in poor, must be discarded. Meanwhile, the distractor effectivity on reading test items on English subject of eighth students of SMPN 12 Tasikmalaya were: 44 (73%) items in function, 12 (420%) items in enough, 2 (7%) items in unfunctional, and 0 (0%) items in poor. Overall, the quality of reading test which had been made by the first researcher in previous study was in good quality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英语科目阅读题的质量如何?
本研究的目的是确定在SMPN 12 Tasikmalaya八年级学生的英语科目阅读测试项目的质量。根据难度、辨别能力和干扰效能对这些项目进行分析。本研究采用描述性定量方法。本研究是为了描述SMPN 12 Tasikmalaya八年级学生阅读测试项目的质量。定量数据以数值数据的形式作为数据或信息,采用项目与试验分析(ITEMAN)程序3.0版进行分析。研究者在之前的研究中已经对阅读进行了研究,所以在收集数据时,研究者使用了文献。它曾经知道由第一个研究者制作的阅读测试项目的质量。结果表明:1)根据题目的难易程度,易题14项(23%),中题32项(53%),难题14项(23%)。在辨别能力方面,“非常好”的51个(85%)、“好”的5个(8%)、“够”的0个(0%)、“差”的4个(7%)必须被丢弃。同时,8年级学生在英语科目阅读测试项目上的分心物有效性为:功能项44项(73%),功能项12项(420%),功能项2项(7%),功能差项0项(0%)。总体而言,在之前的研究中,第一研究者所做的阅读测试的质量是好的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MEMBANGUN HUBUNGAN YANG BAIK ANTARA GURU DAN SISWA HOW IS THE QUALITY OF READING TEST ITEMS ON ENGLISH SUBJECT? PENERAPAN STRATEGI ONE MINUTE MIRROR UNTUK MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATA PELAJARAN ILMU PENGETAHAUAN ALAM DI KELAS V SEKOLAH DASAR NEGERI 017 RANAH SINGKUANG PERAN ORANG TUA DALAM MEMBANGUN LITERASI DIGITAL MELALUI PENERAPAN METODE STEAM PENGGUNAAN VIDEO ANIMASI PADA KETERAMPILAN MENYIMAK CERITA DONGENG SISWA KELAS II SEKOLAH DASAR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1