The Development of Decision Support Systems in the 1960s as Antecedent of “AI-Rationality”

Rolf F. Nohr
{"title":"The Development of Decision Support Systems in the 1960s as Antecedent of “AI-Rationality”","authors":"Rolf F. Nohr","doi":"10.7557/23.6173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The decision making process in a given game is usually organized in binary form and oriented toward a final and finite set of goals. This determinative action shapes the game on both formal and ludological levels. At the same time, however, the computer (or better, the algorithm) is also a decision making machine: the deeply logical calculus of the code and the program do not seem to know any 'perhaps'—the system works (literally) according to the logic of 'or', which represents one of the central elements of digital computing. The decision rationality of computers (at the heart of computer games) is characterized by simplification, reduction, symbolic coding, and also by a dynamic of action and reaction (in the sense of decision and consequence). Such observations about the consequential logic of game-based AI inevitably lead to one grand question: Who is the primary decision maker in games—the player or the machine?","PeriodicalId":247562,"journal":{"name":"Eludamos: Journal for Computer Game Culture","volume":"214 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eludamos: Journal for Computer Game Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7557/23.6173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The decision making process in a given game is usually organized in binary form and oriented toward a final and finite set of goals. This determinative action shapes the game on both formal and ludological levels. At the same time, however, the computer (or better, the algorithm) is also a decision making machine: the deeply logical calculus of the code and the program do not seem to know any 'perhaps'—the system works (literally) according to the logic of 'or', which represents one of the central elements of digital computing. The decision rationality of computers (at the heart of computer games) is characterized by simplification, reduction, symbolic coding, and also by a dynamic of action and reaction (in the sense of decision and consequence). Such observations about the consequential logic of game-based AI inevitably lead to one grand question: Who is the primary decision maker in games—the player or the machine?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
20世纪60年代决策支持系统的发展作为“人工智能理性”的前身
给定游戏中的决策过程通常以二元形式组织,并以最终有限目标为导向。这种决定性的行动在形式和逻辑层面上塑造了游戏。然而,与此同时,计算机(或者更好地说,算法)也是一台决策机器:代码和程序的深度逻辑演算似乎不知道任何“也许”——系统(从字面上)根据“或”的逻辑工作,这代表了数字计算的核心要素之一。计算机的决策理性(电脑游戏的核心)的特点是简化、简化、符号编码,以及行动和反应的动态(在决策和结果的意义上)。这种关于基于游戏的AI的结果逻辑的观察不可避免地导致了一个大问题:谁是游戏中的主要决策者——玩家还是机器?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Playing on life's terms Reimagining a future for game studies, from the ground up A future already past? Time to stop playing Young video game players’ self-identified toxic gaming behaviour
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1