Taking women on boards: a comparative analysis of public policies in higher education

Tanja Klenk, Dominik Antonowicz, Lars Geschwind, R. Pinheiro, A. Pokorska
{"title":"Taking women on boards: a comparative analysis of public policies in higher education","authors":"Tanja Klenk, Dominik Antonowicz, Lars Geschwind, R. Pinheiro, A. Pokorska","doi":"10.1080/23322969.2022.2066014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n There is growing interest in the underlying mechanisms affecting female leaders in Higher Education (HE). This article compares four countries – Germany, Norway, Poland and Sweden to identify key structural conditions (enablers and barriers) for female representation in academia by studying the regulative framework of government policy. Two research questions are guiding the analysis: first, what (if any) policy instruments are chosen to increase the number of female leaders in HE? Second, to what extent does this choice of instruments mirror either sectorial logic (HE) or national policy styles? The empirical results of the article show that while processes of policy diffusion are observable at the sectoral level, gender equality policies and instrument choice differ considerably in the four countries under consideration. The article thus concludes that national policy styles need to be understood as enabling and disabling policy factors for gender equality in HE shaping the process of translating diffused models decisively.","PeriodicalId":212965,"journal":{"name":"Policy Reviews in Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy Reviews in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2022.2066014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT There is growing interest in the underlying mechanisms affecting female leaders in Higher Education (HE). This article compares four countries – Germany, Norway, Poland and Sweden to identify key structural conditions (enablers and barriers) for female representation in academia by studying the regulative framework of government policy. Two research questions are guiding the analysis: first, what (if any) policy instruments are chosen to increase the number of female leaders in HE? Second, to what extent does this choice of instruments mirror either sectorial logic (HE) or national policy styles? The empirical results of the article show that while processes of policy diffusion are observable at the sectoral level, gender equality policies and instrument choice differ considerably in the four countries under consideration. The article thus concludes that national policy styles need to be understood as enabling and disabling policy factors for gender equality in HE shaping the process of translating diffused models decisively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
让女性进入董事会:高等教育公共政策的比较分析
高等教育中影响女性领导者的潜在机制越来越受到关注。本文比较了德国、挪威、波兰和瑞典四个国家,通过研究政府政策的监管框架来确定女性在学术界代表性的关键结构性条件(促进因素和障碍)。两个研究问题指导了分析:首先,选择什么(如果有的话)政策工具来增加高等教育中女性领导者的数量?其次,这种工具选择在多大程度上反映了行业逻辑(HE)或国家政策风格?本文的实证结果表明,虽然在部门层面上可以观察到政策扩散的过程,但所考虑的四个国家的性别平等政策和工具选择差异很大。因此,我们需要将国家政策风格理解为促进性别平等的政策因素,从而决定性地塑造了传播模式的翻译过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Peeling the multiple layers of inequalities in free higher education policies Intermediary organizations and their role in advancing the SDGs in higher education Provincial government and institution level strategy setting: the case of building Chinese ‘world-class universities’ POLICY REVIEWS IN HIGHER EDUCATION: EDITORIAL, Volume 7, Issue 2, September 2023 Isomorphic tensions and anxiety in UK social science doctoral provision
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1