Comparison study of S-Band Vivaldi-based antennas

Nurhayati, E. Setijadi, G. Hendrantoro
{"title":"Comparison study of S-Band Vivaldi-based antennas","authors":"Nurhayati, E. Setijadi, G. Hendrantoro","doi":"10.1109/TENCONSPRING.2016.7519402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper focuses on comparison between coplanar Vivaldi antenna, Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna (AVA) and Balance Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna (BAVA) on FR4 substrate, in the same size and type of substrate and the same opening rate of the exponential taper. The proposed antenna has overall size 1.1λ × λ × 0.016λ and works in 2-4 GHz. The best return loss has been obtained for BAVA of -47 dB at 2.374 GHz from simulated result. For overall of frequency, coplanar vivaldi antenna gets higher gain than AVA and BAVA. Directivity of coplanar Vivaldi is 7.859 dBi at 4 GHz. AVA has more asymmetric radiation pattern than BAVA. Side lobe level for coplanar Vivaldi antenna has better performance than AVA and BAVA.","PeriodicalId":166275,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE Region 10 Symposium (TENSYMP)","volume":"185 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE Region 10 Symposium (TENSYMP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TENCONSPRING.2016.7519402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This paper focuses on comparison between coplanar Vivaldi antenna, Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna (AVA) and Balance Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna (BAVA) on FR4 substrate, in the same size and type of substrate and the same opening rate of the exponential taper. The proposed antenna has overall size 1.1λ × λ × 0.016λ and works in 2-4 GHz. The best return loss has been obtained for BAVA of -47 dB at 2.374 GHz from simulated result. For overall of frequency, coplanar vivaldi antenna gets higher gain than AVA and BAVA. Directivity of coplanar Vivaldi is 7.859 dBi at 4 GHz. AVA has more asymmetric radiation pattern than BAVA. Side lobe level for coplanar Vivaldi antenna has better performance than AVA and BAVA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于s波段vivaldi天线的比较研究
本文重点比较了在相同衬底尺寸和类型、相同指数锥打开率的情况下,FR4衬底上的共面维瓦尔第天线、对跖维瓦尔第天线(AVA)和平衡对跖维瓦尔第天线(BAVA)。天线的总尺寸为1.1λ × λ × 0.016λ,工作频率为2 ~ 4ghz。仿真结果表明,在2.374 GHz频率下,-47 dB的BAVA回波损耗最佳。在频率总体上,共面维瓦尔第天线比AVA和BAVA获得更高的增益。共面维瓦尔第在4 GHz时的指向性为7.859 dBi。AVA比BAVA有更多的不对称辐射。共面维瓦尔第天线的旁瓣电平性能优于AVA和BAVA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interaction techniques using head gaze for virtual reality Tree-based protocol for ad hoc networks constructed with data transmission modems Formal reliability analysis of protective systems in smart grids Comparative analysis of PCA and KPCA on paddy growth stages classification Short term load forecasting of Eid Al Fitr holiday by using interval Type-2 Fuzzy Inference System (Case study: Electrical system of Java Bali in Indonesia)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1