Conformance checking for programmable logic controller programs and specifications

D. Darvas, I. Majzik, E. B. Viñuela
{"title":"Conformance checking for programmable logic controller programs and specifications","authors":"D. Darvas, I. Majzik, E. B. Viñuela","doi":"10.1109/SIES.2016.7509409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Verification of industrial control systems' software is an important task, as the cost of failure in these systems is typically high. Formal verification methods can complement the currently used testing techniques, especially if requirements are formally specified. Behavioural specifications can be used to perform conformance checking against the implementation. However, the typical conformance relations are often more sensitive to differences than the controlled processes in case of many control systems, resulting in counterexamples during verification that are considered as false positives in practice. To overcome this issue, we introduce conformance relations adapted to control systems based on programmable logic controllers (PLCs) with different levels of permissibility. The relations can be selected by the control engineers, depending on the required compliance levels. Defining the new relations and a model checking-based method to check them makes conformance checking a powerful tool for the verification of industrial control systems.","PeriodicalId":185636,"journal":{"name":"2016 11th IEEE Symposium on Industrial Embedded Systems (SIES)","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 11th IEEE Symposium on Industrial Embedded Systems (SIES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIES.2016.7509409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Verification of industrial control systems' software is an important task, as the cost of failure in these systems is typically high. Formal verification methods can complement the currently used testing techniques, especially if requirements are formally specified. Behavioural specifications can be used to perform conformance checking against the implementation. However, the typical conformance relations are often more sensitive to differences than the controlled processes in case of many control systems, resulting in counterexamples during verification that are considered as false positives in practice. To overcome this issue, we introduce conformance relations adapted to control systems based on programmable logic controllers (PLCs) with different levels of permissibility. The relations can be selected by the control engineers, depending on the required compliance levels. Defining the new relations and a model checking-based method to check them makes conformance checking a powerful tool for the verification of industrial control systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可编程逻辑控制器程序和规格的一致性检查
工业控制系统的软件验证是一项重要的任务,因为这些系统的故障成本通常很高。正式的验证方法可以补充当前使用的测试技术,特别是如果需求是正式指定的。行为规范可用于针对实现执行一致性检查。然而,在许多控制系统的情况下,典型的一致性关系往往比受控过程对差异更敏感,导致在验证过程中产生反例,在实践中被认为是假阳性。为了克服这个问题,我们引入了适用于基于具有不同权限级别的可编程逻辑控制器(plc)的控制系统的一致性关系。控制工程师可以根据所需的遵从性级别选择这些关系。定义新的关系和基于模型检查的检验方法,使一致性检查成为工业控制系统验证的有力工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Communication aware multiprocessor binding for shared memory systems Efficient algorithms for memory management in embedded vision systems Static probabilistic timing analysis in presence of faults Conformance checking for programmable logic controller programs and specifications Minimizing stack usage for AUTOSAR/OSEK's restricted fixed-priority preemption threshold support
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1