Lord Acton’s “Organic” Liberalism and His Best Practical Regime

Chris Lazarski
{"title":"Lord Acton’s “Organic” Liberalism and His Best Practical Regime","authors":"Chris Lazarski","doi":"10.5840/cssr20202530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on a forgotten evolutionary trend of liberalism clearly visible in Lord Acton’s writing. According to him, liberalism has roots not only in the theories of early modern thinkers but also in political practice, as seen in English and American political regimes of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. The first—doctrinaire liberalism—aims at changing the political order by appealing to higher principles and resorts to social engineering and coercion. The second rests on the organic growth of existing political institutions, laws and customs. Acton claims that only the latter is truly liberal, while the former is in fact illiberal.","PeriodicalId":348926,"journal":{"name":"The Catholic Social Science Review","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Catholic Social Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/cssr20202530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article focuses on a forgotten evolutionary trend of liberalism clearly visible in Lord Acton’s writing. According to him, liberalism has roots not only in the theories of early modern thinkers but also in political practice, as seen in English and American political regimes of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. The first—doctrinaire liberalism—aims at changing the political order by appealing to higher principles and resorts to social engineering and coercion. The second rests on the organic growth of existing political institutions, laws and customs. Acton claims that only the latter is truly liberal, while the former is in fact illiberal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿克顿勋爵的“有机”自由主义及其最佳实践制度
本文关注的是在阿克顿勋爵的作品中清晰可见的一种被遗忘的自由主义进化趋势。根据他的观点,自由主义不仅植根于早期现代思想家的理论,而且植根于政治实践,正如在17世纪和18世纪的英国和美国政治制度中所看到的那样。第一种理论——自由主义——旨在通过呼吁更高的原则来改变政治秩序,并诉诸社会工程和强制。第二种依赖于现有政治制度、法律和习俗的有机增长。阿克顿声称,只有后者才是真正自由的,而前者实际上是不自由的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Liberal Authoritarianism Charles Zeiders and Peter Devlin, Malignant Narcissism and Power:A Psychodynamic Exploration of Madness and Leadership The Promise and Danger of National Conservatism Marie Gayle, Blandine Chelini-Pont, and Mark J. Rozell, editors, Catholics and US Politics after the 2020 Elections: Understanding the “Swing Vote” Corporate America’s Embrace of Wokism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1