Analysis of Variance of Opinion Scores for MPEG-4 Scalable and Advanced Video Coding

T. Chu, H. Zepernick, V. Sundstedt
{"title":"Analysis of Variance of Opinion Scores for MPEG-4 Scalable and Advanced Video Coding","authors":"T. Chu, H. Zepernick, V. Sundstedt","doi":"10.1109/ICSPCS.2018.8631713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we conduct an analysis of variance (ANOVA) on opinion scores for MPEG-4 scalable video coding (SVC) and advanced video coding (AVC) standards. This work resorts on a publicly available database providing opinion scores from subjective experiments for several scenarios such as different bit rates and resolutions. In particular, ANOVA is used for statistical hypothesis testing to compare two or more sets of opinion scores instead of being constrained to pairs of sets of opinion scores as would be the case for t-tests. As the ANOVA tests of the different scenarios are performed for mean opinion scores (MOS), box plots are also provided in order to assess the distribution of the opinion scores around the median. It is shown that the opinion scores given to the reference videos in SVC and AV C for different resolutions are statistically significantly similar regardless of the content. Further, for the opinion scores of the considered database, the ANOVA tests support the hypothesis that AVC generally outperforms SVC although the performance difference may be less pronounced for higher bit rates. This work also shows that additional insights on the results of subjective experiments can be obtained by extending the analysis of opinion scores beyond MOS to ANOVA tests and box plots.","PeriodicalId":179948,"journal":{"name":"2018 12th International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication Systems (ICSPCS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 12th International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication Systems (ICSPCS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSPCS.2018.8631713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this paper, we conduct an analysis of variance (ANOVA) on opinion scores for MPEG-4 scalable video coding (SVC) and advanced video coding (AVC) standards. This work resorts on a publicly available database providing opinion scores from subjective experiments for several scenarios such as different bit rates and resolutions. In particular, ANOVA is used for statistical hypothesis testing to compare two or more sets of opinion scores instead of being constrained to pairs of sets of opinion scores as would be the case for t-tests. As the ANOVA tests of the different scenarios are performed for mean opinion scores (MOS), box plots are also provided in order to assess the distribution of the opinion scores around the median. It is shown that the opinion scores given to the reference videos in SVC and AV C for different resolutions are statistically significantly similar regardless of the content. Further, for the opinion scores of the considered database, the ANOVA tests support the hypothesis that AVC generally outperforms SVC although the performance difference may be less pronounced for higher bit rates. This work also shows that additional insights on the results of subjective experiments can be obtained by extending the analysis of opinion scores beyond MOS to ANOVA tests and box plots.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MPEG-4可扩展和高级视频编码意见评分方差分析
在本文中,我们对MPEG-4可扩展视频编码(SVC)和高级视频编码(AVC)标准的意见评分进行方差分析(ANOVA)。这项工作依赖于一个公开可用的数据库,该数据库提供了不同场景(如不同比特率和分辨率)的主观实验的意见评分。特别地,方差分析用于统计假设检验,以比较两组或更多组的意见得分,而不是像t检验那样被限制在两组意见得分上。由于对不同情景的平均意见得分(MOS)进行了方差分析,因此还提供了箱形图,以评估意见得分在中位数附近的分布。结果表明,无论视频内容如何,SVC和AV C在不同分辨率下对参考视频的评价得分具有统计学上的显著性相似。此外,对于所考虑的数据库的意见得分,方差分析测试支持AVC通常优于SVC的假设,尽管性能差异可能在更高的比特率下不太明显。这项工作还表明,通过将意见得分的分析从MOS扩展到方差分析测试和箱形图,可以获得对主观实验结果的额外见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Design, Implementation & Performance Analysis of Low Cost High Performance Computing (HPC) Clusters Range Extension Using Opal in Open Environments The Smallest Critical Sets of Latin Squares Forward-Looking Clutter Suppression Approach of Airborne Radar Based on KA-JDL Algorithm of Object Filtering Analysis of Variance of Opinion Scores for MPEG-4 Scalable and Advanced Video Coding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1