Uma nova perspectiva: a análise dos dispute boards como mecanismos alternativos de resolução de conflitos aplicado aos contratos de infraestrutura

Arthur Bobsin de Moraes, Luiz Fernando Calegari
{"title":"Uma nova perspectiva: a análise dos dispute boards como mecanismos alternativos de resolução de conflitos aplicado aos contratos de infraestrutura","authors":"Arthur Bobsin de Moraes, Luiz Fernando Calegari","doi":"10.52028/tce-sc.v01.i01.art06.rj","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay has as its object the analysis of dispute boards as a new perspective of Public Administration, with a more consensual performance, through models and acts with different actors of society. A brief introduction will be made on the current paradigm of Administration, without the objective of studying the models of Administration. After demonstrating the change in perspective, the essay will focus on the dispute board institute, a method for resolving disputes involving contracts of great complexity and economic importance, as with infrastructure contracts agreed by the Public Administration. Finally, this article will examine the use of dispute boards in public works using as an example a comparison between two works, one in which the mechanism was used (São Paulo City Metro) and one in which it was not used (Ponte Hercílio Luz in Florianópolis, Santa Catarina), intending to demonstrate that they can bring efficiency to infrastructure.","PeriodicalId":231349,"journal":{"name":"Revista do Tribunal de Contas do Estado de Santa Catarina","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista do Tribunal de Contas do Estado de Santa Catarina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52028/tce-sc.v01.i01.art06.rj","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay has as its object the analysis of dispute boards as a new perspective of Public Administration, with a more consensual performance, through models and acts with different actors of society. A brief introduction will be made on the current paradigm of Administration, without the objective of studying the models of Administration. After demonstrating the change in perspective, the essay will focus on the dispute board institute, a method for resolving disputes involving contracts of great complexity and economic importance, as with infrastructure contracts agreed by the Public Administration. Finally, this article will examine the use of dispute boards in public works using as an example a comparison between two works, one in which the mechanism was used (São Paulo City Metro) and one in which it was not used (Ponte Hercílio Luz in Florianópolis, Santa Catarina), intending to demonstrate that they can bring efficiency to infrastructure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新视角:分析争议委员会作为应用于基础设施合同的替代争议解决机制
本文的目标是分析纠纷委员会作为公共行政的新视角,通过与社会不同参与者的模型和行为,具有更一致的表现。本文将简要介绍当前的行政管理范式,但不以研究行政管理模式为目的。在展示了视角的变化之后,本文将重点关注争议委员会研究所,这是一种解决涉及非常复杂和经济重要性合同的争议的方法,如公共行政部门同意的基础设施合同。最后,本文将研究纠纷板在公共工程中的使用,以两个工程之间的比较为例,一个是使用该机制(圣保罗城市地铁),另一个是不使用该机制(Florianópolis,圣卡塔琳娜州的Ponte Hercílio Luz),旨在证明它们可以为基础设施带来效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Condicionantes do tempo de commuting dos centros urbanos brasileiros: uma análise empírica Estado, democracia e controle das contas públicas: os encargos do Tribunal de Contas de Santa Catarina Uma nova perspectiva: a análise dos dispute boards como mecanismos alternativos de resolução de conflitos aplicado aos contratos de infraestrutura Consequencialismo jurídico e desconsideração da personalidade jurídica: aplicação nos processos de controle externo Lei nº 14.230/21: um apanhado geral sobre os recentes posicionamentos do Supremo Tribunal Federal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1