'Core Labour Standards' and the Transformation of the International Labour Rights Regime

Philip Alston
{"title":"'Core Labour Standards' and the Transformation of the International Labour Rights Regime","authors":"Philip Alston","doi":"10.1093/EJIL/15.3.457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The past decade has seen a transformation of the international labour rights regime based primarily on the adoption of the 1998 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, and the widespread use of the concept of 'core labour standards'. Notwithstanding the enthusiasm which has greeted these innovations, it is argued that the resulting regime has major potential flaws, including: an excessive reliance on principles rather than rights, a system which invokes principles that are delinked from the corresponding standards and are thus effectively undefined, an ethos of voluntarism in relation to implementation and enforcement, an unstructured and unaccountable decentralization of responsibility, and a willingness to accept soft 'promotionalism' as the bottom line. The regime needs urgent reforms, such as anchoring the principles firmly in the relevant ILO standards, giving greater substance to the Follow-up mechanism, extending monitoring under the Declaration to include an empirical overview of practice under the bilateral and regional mechanisms which have invoked ILO principles and the Declaration itself, and adequately funding the commitment to workers' rights.","PeriodicalId":448271,"journal":{"name":"Employment & Labor Law Abstracts eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"223","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employment & Labor Law Abstracts eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/EJIL/15.3.457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 223

Abstract

The past decade has seen a transformation of the international labour rights regime based primarily on the adoption of the 1998 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, and the widespread use of the concept of 'core labour standards'. Notwithstanding the enthusiasm which has greeted these innovations, it is argued that the resulting regime has major potential flaws, including: an excessive reliance on principles rather than rights, a system which invokes principles that are delinked from the corresponding standards and are thus effectively undefined, an ethos of voluntarism in relation to implementation and enforcement, an unstructured and unaccountable decentralization of responsibility, and a willingness to accept soft 'promotionalism' as the bottom line. The regime needs urgent reforms, such as anchoring the principles firmly in the relevant ILO standards, giving greater substance to the Follow-up mechanism, extending monitoring under the Declaration to include an empirical overview of practice under the bilateral and regional mechanisms which have invoked ILO principles and the Declaration itself, and adequately funding the commitment to workers' rights.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“核心劳工标准”与国际劳工权利制度的转型
在过去的十年里,国际劳工权利制度发生了转变,主要是基于1998年国际劳工组织《关于工作中的基本原则和权利的宣言》的通过,以及“核心劳工标准”概念的广泛使用。尽管人们对这些创新充满热情,但有人认为,由此产生的制度存在重大的潜在缺陷,包括:过度依赖原则而不是权利,一个与相应标准脱节的原则的系统,因此实际上是不明确的,一种与实施和执行有关的自愿主义精神,一种无结构和不负责任的责任下放,以及一种接受软“推广主义”作为底线的意愿。该制度需要紧急改革,例如将各项原则牢固地固定在劳工组织的有关标准中,使后续机制具有更大的实质内容,扩大《宣言》下的监测范围,包括对援引劳工组织原则和《宣言》本身的双边和区域机制下的实践进行经验性概述,并充分资助对工人权利的承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fair Measures: A Behavioral Realist Revision of 'Affirmative Action' Labor Restructuring in China's Industrial Sector: Towards a Functioning Urban Labor Market Wage and Employment Effects of Immigration to Germany: Evidence from a Skill Group Approach Fixed Term Employment Contracts in an Equilibrium Search Model The American Experience with Exclusive Representation: Implications for the Issue of Plural Unionism in South Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1