Preventive law in early Ireland. Rereading the Additamenta in the Book of Armagh

Andrew Rabin
{"title":"Preventive law in early Ireland. Rereading the Additamenta in the Book of Armagh","authors":"Andrew Rabin","doi":"10.26818/NORTAMERCELTSTUD.2.1.0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article argues that the so-called Additamenta, found on ff. 16r–18v of the Book of Armagh, may have functioned as a form of preventive law. Reading the Additamenta in this fashion suggests that the evidence they adduce to legitimize Armagh's property rights reflects those categories of claims thought most likely to prevail should the foundation's landholdings fall into dispute. As an archive of documents that both preserved and shaped institutional memory, they provided a historical frame that limited the possibility of challenges to Armagh's standing or, if those challenges did come to trial, shaped the court's perception to the foundation's benefit. Consequently, even if these documents do not necessarily reflect an ongoing charter tradition, we may still use them as case studies revealing one way in which early Irish landowners—especially those associated with ecclesiastical foundations like Armagh—utilized text and narrative to influence the progress of legal disputes.","PeriodicalId":160851,"journal":{"name":"North American journal of Celtic studies","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American journal of Celtic studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26818/NORTAMERCELTSTUD.2.1.0037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This article argues that the so-called Additamenta, found on ff. 16r–18v of the Book of Armagh, may have functioned as a form of preventive law. Reading the Additamenta in this fashion suggests that the evidence they adduce to legitimize Armagh's property rights reflects those categories of claims thought most likely to prevail should the foundation's landholdings fall into dispute. As an archive of documents that both preserved and shaped institutional memory, they provided a historical frame that limited the possibility of challenges to Armagh's standing or, if those challenges did come to trial, shaped the court's perception to the foundation's benefit. Consequently, even if these documents do not necessarily reflect an ongoing charter tradition, we may still use them as case studies revealing one way in which early Irish landowners—especially those associated with ecclesiastical foundations like Armagh—utilized text and narrative to influence the progress of legal disputes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
爱尔兰早期的预防法律。重读《阿玛之书》的附录
摘要:本文认为所谓的增补,是在ff上发现的。《阿玛书》第16r-18v段,可能起到了预防法律的作用。以这种方式解读《附加条款》表明,他们用来使阿马的财产权合法化的证据,反映了那些被认为最有可能在基金会的土地所有权陷入争议时占上风的主张类别。作为保存和塑造机构记忆的文件档案,它们提供了一个历史框架,限制了对阿马地位提出挑战的可能性,或者,如果这些挑战真的进入审判阶段,也会影响法院对基金会的看法。因此,即使这些文件不一定反映持续的宪章传统,我们仍然可以用它们作为案例研究,揭示早期爱尔兰土地所有者——尤其是那些与教会基金会(如阿马)有关的土地所有者——利用文本和叙事来影响法律纠纷的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Memestra eget. Non-standard use of prepositions from second-language learners in Modern Breton 'A matter to none but the men of the Island of Britain'. Historical revisionism and the assertion of Brittonic primacy in Breudwyt Maxen Wledic History and identity in early medieval Wales by Rebecca Thomas (review) The kings of Aileach and the Vikings, ad 800–1060 by Darren McGettigan (review) The origin legends of early medieval Britain and Ireland by Lindy Brady (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1