Studniční stavení ve Zlaté Koruně jako před-parléřovská stavebnice. Příklad inkorporace dlouhodobě deponovaných článků do mladší stavby

Filip Facincani
{"title":"Studniční stavení ve Zlaté Koruně jako před-parléřovská stavebnice. Příklad inkorporace dlouhodobě deponovaných článků do mladší stavby","authors":"Filip Facincani","doi":"10.14712/24647055.2023.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the paper is to present to present the results of the field survey of the fragments of the cloister lavatorium in Zlatá Koruna monastery and to present a proposal for reassessing the existing views on its building history. On the basis of formal analysis and comparison with local shape-related architectural parts, re-claimed by recent research, it proposes to accept the parts of cloister lavatorium as pre-Parlerian, and thus dating from around and after 1300. The paper does not dispute the building sequence of the convent and cloister as a whole, as accepted by the previous literature – it suggests that the parts of cloister lavatorium were made at the same time as the vault shafts of the north-west corner of the cloister and possibly the vault shafts of abbot’s chapel, and deposited in the grounds of the monastery building workshop before they could be incorporated into the building. Arguments for accepting the cloister lavatorium fragments as pre-Parlerian are their close formal association with the shafts of the north-west bay of the cloister, for which an early dating to c. 1300 and after is highly probable. Accepting the cloister lavatorium parts as a product of the construction phase of the turn of the 13th and 14th centuries means partially reconsidering the existing views on the pace of construction of the royal monastery of Zlatá Koruna. This seems to have been greater than research assumed at the turn of the centuries.","PeriodicalId":158647,"journal":{"name":"AUC PHILOSOPHICA ET HISTORICA","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AUC PHILOSOPHICA ET HISTORICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/24647055.2023.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to present to present the results of the field survey of the fragments of the cloister lavatorium in Zlatá Koruna monastery and to present a proposal for reassessing the existing views on its building history. On the basis of formal analysis and comparison with local shape-related architectural parts, re-claimed by recent research, it proposes to accept the parts of cloister lavatorium as pre-Parlerian, and thus dating from around and after 1300. The paper does not dispute the building sequence of the convent and cloister as a whole, as accepted by the previous literature – it suggests that the parts of cloister lavatorium were made at the same time as the vault shafts of the north-west corner of the cloister and possibly the vault shafts of abbot’s chapel, and deposited in the grounds of the monastery building workshop before they could be incorporated into the building. Arguments for accepting the cloister lavatorium fragments as pre-Parlerian are their close formal association with the shafts of the north-west bay of the cloister, for which an early dating to c. 1300 and after is highly probable. Accepting the cloister lavatorium parts as a product of the construction phase of the turn of the 13th and 14th centuries means partially reconsidering the existing views on the pace of construction of the royal monastery of Zlatá Koruna. This seems to have been greater than research assumed at the turn of the centuries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本文的目的是介绍对zlat Koruna修道院修道院厕所碎片的实地调查结果,并提出对其建筑历史的现有观点进行重新评估的建议。在形式分析和与当地形状相关的建筑部分进行比较的基础上,最近的研究重新提出,它建议接受修道院厕所的部分为前帕勒里安,因此可以追溯到1300年左右。这篇论文并没有质疑修道院和回廊作为一个整体的建筑顺序,正如之前的文献所接受的那样——它表明,回廊厕所的部分是与回廊西北角的拱顶轴同时建造的,可能还有修道院礼拜堂的拱顶轴,在它们被纳入建筑之前,它们被放置在修道院建筑车间的地面上。接受回廊盥洗室碎片为前帕勒尔时代的论据是,它们与回廊西北湾的竖井有密切的正式联系,这很可能早在公元1300年或之后。将回廊厕所部分作为13世纪和14世纪建筑阶段的产物,意味着部分重新考虑对zlat Koruna皇家修道院建设速度的现有看法。这似乎比世纪之交时的研究假设要大得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Genderové kontexty tvorby Běly Kolářové Antonín Goller, Stephan Tragl, Johann Koch: Méně známí architekti ve službách severočeské a východočeské šlechty ve druhé polovině 19. století „Mít oči k vidění i k pláči“ aneb jak tlumočit bolest minulosti Studniční stavení ve Zlaté Koruně jako před-parléřovská stavebnice. Příklad inkorporace dlouhodobě deponovaných článků do mladší stavby Krev, slzy a bolest – Imaginace a emocionalita na příkladu polychromovaných barokních plastik ze svatých schodů
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1