Holding Europe back: Italy and EU development policy

M. Carbone
{"title":"Holding Europe back: Italy and EU development policy","authors":"M. Carbone","doi":"10.1080/14613190701414517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relationship between the European Union (EU) and the developing world has undergone a number of significant changes since the end of the cold war. Following a lengthy discussion on the future of the Lomé Convention, the Cotonou Agreement marked the beginning of a new partnership between the European Community (EC) and the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) group of states. Moreover, EC development policy has gradually become global, with substantial programmes being started in the Mediterranean, Latin America and Central and Eastern Europe. Meanwhile, not only have resources managed at the EC level increased, but Member States have also taken various initiatives to coordinate their bilateral policies. The commitments made in March 2002 and May 2005 to boost quantity and enhance quality of aid and the adoption of the European Consensus on Development in December 2005 are two tangible signs of a desire to improve the effectiveness and visibility of EU aid. From a theoretical point of view, the conventional position is that development policy in the EU reflects the preferences of France and the UK, and the policy entrepreneurship of the European Commission. More generally, two broad tendencies have dominated the Member States’ attitudes to European development cooperation: ‘regionalist’—initially promoted by France and Belgium and then by Portugal and Spain—which has recognized the strategic links with former colonies; ‘globalist’—initially supported by Germany and the Netherlands and then by the UK and the Nordic countries—which has been more concerned with poverty levels. The role of Italy in EU development policy is generally overlooked in these analyses. This omission would seem unjustified, considering that Italy has progressively increased the share of resources channelled through the EU. Similarly, the literature on Italy in the EU concentrates on few issues, namely, the common agricultural policy (CAP), regional policy, economic and monetary","PeriodicalId":313717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14613190701414517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The relationship between the European Union (EU) and the developing world has undergone a number of significant changes since the end of the cold war. Following a lengthy discussion on the future of the Lomé Convention, the Cotonou Agreement marked the beginning of a new partnership between the European Community (EC) and the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) group of states. Moreover, EC development policy has gradually become global, with substantial programmes being started in the Mediterranean, Latin America and Central and Eastern Europe. Meanwhile, not only have resources managed at the EC level increased, but Member States have also taken various initiatives to coordinate their bilateral policies. The commitments made in March 2002 and May 2005 to boost quantity and enhance quality of aid and the adoption of the European Consensus on Development in December 2005 are two tangible signs of a desire to improve the effectiveness and visibility of EU aid. From a theoretical point of view, the conventional position is that development policy in the EU reflects the preferences of France and the UK, and the policy entrepreneurship of the European Commission. More generally, two broad tendencies have dominated the Member States’ attitudes to European development cooperation: ‘regionalist’—initially promoted by France and Belgium and then by Portugal and Spain—which has recognized the strategic links with former colonies; ‘globalist’—initially supported by Germany and the Netherlands and then by the UK and the Nordic countries—which has been more concerned with poverty levels. The role of Italy in EU development policy is generally overlooked in these analyses. This omission would seem unjustified, considering that Italy has progressively increased the share of resources channelled through the EU. Similarly, the literature on Italy in the EU concentrates on few issues, namely, the common agricultural policy (CAP), regional policy, economic and monetary
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阻碍欧洲发展:意大利与欧盟发展政策
自冷战结束以来,欧洲联盟(欧盟)与发展中世界之间的关系经历了若干重大变化。在对《洛佩斯公约》的未来进行了长时间的讨论之后,《科托努协定》标志着欧洲共同体(欧共体)与非洲、加勒比和太平洋国家集团(非加太国家集团)之间新的伙伴关系的开始。此外,欧共体的发展政策已逐渐成为全球性的,在地中海、拉丁美洲、中欧和东欧开始了大量的方案。与此同时,不仅欧共体一级管理的资源增加了,而且各会员国也采取了各种主动行动来协调它们的双边政策。2002年3月和2005年5月作出的增加援助数量和提高援助质量的承诺,以及2005年12月通过的《欧洲发展共识》,是提高欧盟援助有效性和可见度的愿望的两个切实迹象。从理论角度来看,传统观点认为欧盟的发展政策反映了法国和英国的偏好,以及欧盟委员会的政策创业精神。更一般地说,两大趋势主导了会员国对欧洲发展合作的态度:“区域主义”- -最初由法国和比利时提倡,然后由葡萄牙和西班牙提倡- -承认与前殖民地的战略联系;“全球主义者”——最初得到德国和荷兰的支持,然后得到英国和北欧国家的支持——更关注贫困水平。在这些分析中,意大利在欧盟发展政策中的作用通常被忽视。考虑到意大利已经逐步增加了通过欧盟输送的资源份额,这种遗漏似乎是不合理的。同样,关于意大利在欧盟的文献集中在几个问题上,即共同农业政策(CAP),区域政策,经济和货币
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Leaders, political behaviour and decision-making: the case of the former President of the Republic of Cyprus, George Vasiliou Understanding banking sector reforms in Turkey: assessing the roles of domestic versus external actors The Europeanization of Turkey and its impact on the Cyprus problem Building institutional, economic and social capacities through discourse: the role of NGOs in the context of Bosnia-Herzegovina and Serbia The Southern European model of immigration: do the cases of Malta, Cyprus and Slovenia fit?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1