Aspects Concerning the Battle of Baia (1467) and the Wound of King Matthias Corvin. On the Controversy in the Chronicles of the Times and on a Less Known Surgical Intervention
{"title":"Aspects Concerning the Battle of Baia (1467) and the Wound of King Matthias Corvin. On the Controversy in the Chronicles of the Times and on a Less Known Surgical Intervention","authors":"Gheorghe Bichicean","doi":"10.2478/amsh-2022-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The wounding of the Hungarian king Matthias Corvinus in the battle of Baia with Stephen the Great, in 1467, is known and true. The issues that need to be clarified and that we proposed in this study, concern the weapon(s) that caused the king’s wound during the Battle of Baia; if there were arrows, how many arrows struck the king’s body; what parts of the body were pierced by the arrow(s); how did Matia Corvin’s wound heal: naturally or through the intervention of a surgeon? All this has given rise to some controversies, which we would like to analyze from the most important known sources.","PeriodicalId":206123,"journal":{"name":"Acta Marisiensis. Seria Historia","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Marisiensis. Seria Historia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/amsh-2022-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract The wounding of the Hungarian king Matthias Corvinus in the battle of Baia with Stephen the Great, in 1467, is known and true. The issues that need to be clarified and that we proposed in this study, concern the weapon(s) that caused the king’s wound during the Battle of Baia; if there were arrows, how many arrows struck the king’s body; what parts of the body were pierced by the arrow(s); how did Matia Corvin’s wound heal: naturally or through the intervention of a surgeon? All this has given rise to some controversies, which we would like to analyze from the most important known sources.
1467年，匈牙利国王马蒂亚斯·科维努斯(Matthias Corvinus)在与斯蒂芬大帝(Stephen The Great)的巴亚战役中受伤，这是众所周知的事实。需要澄清的问题和我们在本研究中提出的问题，涉及在巴亚战役中造成国王受伤的武器;如果有箭，有多少箭射中了国王的身体;箭刺穿了身体的哪些部位;Matia Corvin的伤口是如何愈合的:自然愈合还是通过外科医生的干预?所有这些都引起了一些争议，我们想从最重要的已知来源来分析这些争议。
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
