Evaluation of Value Chains and Regional Integration in Asia

Nakgyoon Choi
{"title":"Evaluation of Value Chains and Regional Integration in Asia","authors":"Nakgyoon Choi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3887348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Asian share in world value added in exports and imports increased substantially between 1995 and 2015. The share of trade in intermediate goods has been dominant in Asia compared to those of Europe, America, and the rest of the world. The deeper trade agreements have boosted up global value chains because the international trade in global value chains was regional rather than multilateral. When we analyzed the World Bank database on the content of preferential trade agreements, however, the regional trade agreements in Asia did not turn out to be as deep as those in America and Europe. Deeper regional integration contributes to the organization of global value chains along the regional clusters. In addition, Asia centered around China turns out to import more intermediate goods than Europe and America because it assembles the parts and components to export the final goods to foreign countries. In particular, the so-called Factory Asia is much closer to a network rather than the hub-and-spoke pattern observed in Factory North America and Factory Europe, as Baldwin and Lopez-Gonzalez (2015) claims. Therefore Asian value chains are exposed to more serious risk sources. One of the implications of rising global val-ue chains for Asian economic development is that they need to be resilient against shocks from risk sources including natural disruptions because there is a potential for these shocks to propagate throughout the region.","PeriodicalId":103524,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Asia & South East Asia (Topic)","volume":"146 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Asia & South East Asia (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3887348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Asian share in world value added in exports and imports increased substantially between 1995 and 2015. The share of trade in intermediate goods has been dominant in Asia compared to those of Europe, America, and the rest of the world. The deeper trade agreements have boosted up global value chains because the international trade in global value chains was regional rather than multilateral. When we analyzed the World Bank database on the content of preferential trade agreements, however, the regional trade agreements in Asia did not turn out to be as deep as those in America and Europe. Deeper regional integration contributes to the organization of global value chains along the regional clusters. In addition, Asia centered around China turns out to import more intermediate goods than Europe and America because it assembles the parts and components to export the final goods to foreign countries. In particular, the so-called Factory Asia is much closer to a network rather than the hub-and-spoke pattern observed in Factory North America and Factory Europe, as Baldwin and Lopez-Gonzalez (2015) claims. Therefore Asian value chains are exposed to more serious risk sources. One of the implications of rising global val-ue chains for Asian economic development is that they need to be resilient against shocks from risk sources including natural disruptions because there is a potential for these shocks to propagate throughout the region.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
价值链评估与亚洲区域一体化
1995年至2015年,亚洲进出口增加值占世界比重大幅上升。与欧洲、美洲和世界其他地区相比,亚洲的中间产品贸易份额一直占据主导地位。更深层次的贸易协定提升了全球价值链,因为全球价值链中的国际贸易是区域性的,而不是多边的。然而,当我们分析世界银行关于优惠贸易协定内容的数据库时,我们发现亚洲的区域贸易协定并不像美国和欧洲那样深入。深化区域一体化有利于全球价值链沿着区域集群组织。此外,以中国为中心的亚洲比欧洲和美国进口更多的中间产品,因为它组装零部件并将最终产品出口到国外。特别是,所谓的亚洲工厂更接近于一个网络,而不是像Baldwin和Lopez-Gonzalez(2015)所说的那样,在北美工厂和欧洲工厂中观察到的中心和辐状模式。因此,亚洲价值链暴露于更严重的风险来源。不断上升的全球价值链对亚洲经济发展的影响之一是,它们需要抵御来自风险来源的冲击,包括自然破坏,因为这些冲击有可能在整个地区蔓延。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction: New Asian Regionalism as a Global Paradigm Shift Yellowization Versus Tradition: Yellowization Event in Solo City 1997 Evaluation of Value Chains and Regional Integration in Asia The Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC) and its Potential Opportunities for Sri Lanka Predictability of Financial Markets in ASEAN Countries using Machine Learning Techniques
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1