Globalisation and Development Inequalities: Challenges and Prospects for ' A just Development'

Jacob Tagarirofa, David Tobias
{"title":"Globalisation and Development Inequalities: Challenges and Prospects for ' A just Development'","authors":"Jacob Tagarirofa, David Tobias","doi":"10.15580/GJSS.2013.5.022613499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper explores the ramifications of globalisation as a process, ideology and a theory on the embryonic and apparent discrepancies in development status between and within nations. It illuminated on the socio-economic and political forces behind globalisation and the implications of that process on access to resources, exercise of political and economic power in international governance and the resultant asymmetrical relations between nations in the global village. This endeavour was enabled through a multi-perspective approach in which various macro and micro sociological theories defined the lens for analysis some which entails the New International Division of Labour theory and the World Systems’ theory as they were intrinsically a function and agent for the materialisation of the process of globalisation. Methodologically, the paper adopted the qualitative comparative case study approach which perfectly ushered the opportunity to juxtapose intricacies of different events and outcomes of the lopsided international relations on development between nations in the global village. The paper maintained the notion that, globalisation was an ideological apparatus meant to mystify and veil the realities of exploitation dictated by the new world system yet positively skewed to the Industrialised World at the peril of the Developing Countries.","PeriodicalId":145745,"journal":{"name":"Greener Journal of Social Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Greener Journal of Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15580/GJSS.2013.5.022613499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper explores the ramifications of globalisation as a process, ideology and a theory on the embryonic and apparent discrepancies in development status between and within nations. It illuminated on the socio-economic and political forces behind globalisation and the implications of that process on access to resources, exercise of political and economic power in international governance and the resultant asymmetrical relations between nations in the global village. This endeavour was enabled through a multi-perspective approach in which various macro and micro sociological theories defined the lens for analysis some which entails the New International Division of Labour theory and the World Systems’ theory as they were intrinsically a function and agent for the materialisation of the process of globalisation. Methodologically, the paper adopted the qualitative comparative case study approach which perfectly ushered the opportunity to juxtapose intricacies of different events and outcomes of the lopsided international relations on development between nations in the global village. The paper maintained the notion that, globalisation was an ideological apparatus meant to mystify and veil the realities of exploitation dictated by the new world system yet positively skewed to the Industrialised World at the peril of the Developing Countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球化与发展不平等:“公正发展”的挑战与前景
本文探讨了全球化作为一个过程、意识形态和理论的影响,探讨了国家之间和国家内部发展状况的萌芽和明显差异。它阐明了全球化背后的社会经济和政治力量,以及这一进程对获取资源、在国际治理中行使政治和经济权力以及由此产生的地球村各国之间不对称关系的影响。这种努力是通过一种多视角的方法实现的,在这种方法中,各种宏观和微观社会学理论定义了分析的镜头,其中一些需要新国际劳动分工理论和世界体系理论,因为它们本质上是全球化过程物质化的功能和代理人。在方法上,本文采用了定性的比较案例研究方法,这完美地为将地球村中国家之间发展的不平衡国际关系的不同事件和结果的复杂性并列提供了机会。该文件坚持这样一种观点,即全球化是一种意识形态机器,旨在神秘化和掩盖新世界体系所支配的剥削现实,但却积极地向工业化世界倾斜,危及发展中国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A study of perspectives on cultural dimensions and employee performance in Zimbabwe State Universities A framework for Promoting Good governance of Stakeholders in Zimbabwe local authorities: The case of Harare Municipality Gender Dynamics in Climate Change, Mitigating Mechanisms and Outcome: Evidence from Women Farmers in Muyuka, Cameroon Teachers perceptions on the causes of indiscipline among learners with disabilities learning in inclusive education setting. A case study of Sanyati district in Zimbabwe Cameroon in the Whirlwind of the Millennium Development Goals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1