SLOBODAN PRISTUP INFORMACIJA OD JAVNOG ZNAČAJA I MEDIJSKE USLUGE

Jelena P. Vučković
{"title":"SLOBODAN PRISTUP INFORMACIJA OD JAVNOG ZNAČAJA I MEDIJSKE USLUGE","authors":"Jelena P. Vučković","doi":"10.46793/xixmajsko.529v","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author believes that the media have a duty to provide information and inform the public about all issues of public interest. It can also be considered that media information by the nature of \"media matters\" is information of public interest, and media services are \"services to the public\". Media services contain information of public interest in the essential material sense because the editorial control of the media assesses that the public has the idea to (sa)know about certain information. The paper points out that journalists in the provision of media services have the right to access information of public importance. However, their professional knowledge, experience and responsibility puts them in a special position in cases where public authorities deny the right of access to information with the argument that they have a certain level of secrecy. Media requests that responsible persons of public authorities, the Commissioner and other participants in such \"cases\" give their comments and express their views and opinions, further focus, raise and \"warm up\" the attention of the public, giving this information the character of information of public importance in the essential sense. At the same time, professional and responsible media informing the public about such \"prohibited\" documents, cases and secret information is an additional argument. which may contribute to the application of the \"test of public interest\" that applicants of the right to free access to information of public importance finally exercise their right. The author also points out the possible situations of \"leaking\" of secret information and even business secrets through the media, but also to the current regulations in the Republic of Serbia and the EU this matter that broadly covers and resolves such situations.","PeriodicalId":325482,"journal":{"name":"Pravna regulativa usluga u nacionalnim zakonodavstvima i pravu Evropske Unije","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pravna regulativa usluga u nacionalnim zakonodavstvima i pravu Evropske Unije","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46793/xixmajsko.529v","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The author believes that the media have a duty to provide information and inform the public about all issues of public interest. It can also be considered that media information by the nature of "media matters" is information of public interest, and media services are "services to the public". Media services contain information of public interest in the essential material sense because the editorial control of the media assesses that the public has the idea to (sa)know about certain information. The paper points out that journalists in the provision of media services have the right to access information of public importance. However, their professional knowledge, experience and responsibility puts them in a special position in cases where public authorities deny the right of access to information with the argument that they have a certain level of secrecy. Media requests that responsible persons of public authorities, the Commissioner and other participants in such "cases" give their comments and express their views and opinions, further focus, raise and "warm up" the attention of the public, giving this information the character of information of public importance in the essential sense. At the same time, professional and responsible media informing the public about such "prohibited" documents, cases and secret information is an additional argument. which may contribute to the application of the "test of public interest" that applicants of the right to free access to information of public importance finally exercise their right. The author also points out the possible situations of "leaking" of secret information and even business secrets through the media, but also to the current regulations in the Republic of Serbia and the EU this matter that broadly covers and resolves such situations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作者认为,媒体有义务向公众提供信息,并将公众关心的所有问题告知公众。也可以认为,具有“媒体事项”性质的媒体信息是具有公共利益的信息,媒体服务是“为公众服务”。媒体服务包含了基本物质意义上公众感兴趣的信息,因为媒体的编辑控制评估公众有想法(sa)知道某些信息。文章指出,新闻工作者在提供媒体服务的过程中,有获取具有公共重要性的信息的权利。然而,他们的专业知识、经验和责任使他们在公共当局以他们有一定程度的保密为由拒绝获得信息的权利的情况下处于特殊地位。媒体要求公共当局的负责人、专员和其他参与这类“案件”的人士发表意见,表达他们的观点和意见,进一步集中、提高和“暖化”公众的注意力,使这类信息具有本质意义上的公共重要性信息的特征。同时,专业和负责任的媒体告知公众这些“被禁止的”文件、案件和秘密信息是一个额外的论据。这可能有助于“公共利益检验”的适用,即自由获取具有公共重要性的信息的权利申请人最终行使其权利。作者还指出了通过媒体“泄露”秘密信息甚至商业秘密的可能情况,同时也指出了塞尔维亚共和国和欧盟现行法规对这一问题的广泛涵盖和解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PRIMENA „BALANCED SCORECARD“ MODELA U BANKARSKOM POSLOVANjU PRAVNA REGULATIVA USLUGA PRIVATNE BEZBEDNOSTI U SRBIJI I EU PUNOMOĆJE DATO U INOSTRANSTVU ZA ZAKLjUČENjE UGOVORA O PROMETU NEPOKRETNOSTI KOJA SE NALAZI U DOMAĆOJ DRŽAVI – NEKOLIKO NAPOMENA IZ UGLA MEĐUNARODNOG PRIVATNOG PRAVA SRBIJE I MEĐUNARODNOG PRIVATNOG PRAVA CRNE GORE EKSPROPRIJACIJA KAO PREDUSLOV ZA PRUŽANjE USLUGA OD OPŠTEG INTERESA PRUŽANjE USLUGA KULTURNO-UMETNIČKIH DRUŠTAVA I CENTARA ZA NEGOVANjE TRADICIONALNE KULTURE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1