Development of decision-making tool for construction method selection: choosing and optimizing offsite construction

Emna Attouri, Z. Lafhaj, Laure Ducoulombier, Bruno Linéatte
{"title":"Development of decision-making tool for construction method selection: choosing and optimizing offsite construction","authors":"Emna Attouri, Z. Lafhaj, Laure Ducoulombier, Bruno Linéatte","doi":"10.29173/mocs261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Offsite construction is considered as a possible solution for addressing time, quality and cost concerns associated with traditional construction method. Successful implementation of these methods on a particular project requires systematic analysis and early decision making based on specific factors of the project. There is a lack of an efficient systematic approach that can match the changing needs, deal with the growing complexity of building projects and take into consideration recently developed innovations, technologies and regulations. The objective of this study is the development of an early-phase decision tool to support construction project teams in selecting construction methods. This paper proposes a multi-level decision framework. The first level conducts a feasibility study and evaluates the applicability of offsite construction. The second level proposes an integrated approach for the decision-making problem that combines the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE). The combination of both approaches enables a careful evaluation of different construction methods and scenarios for the same project. A computerized tool is developed and tested on a case study to help a project team in the decision-making process.","PeriodicalId":422911,"journal":{"name":"Modular and Offsite Construction (MOC) Summit Proceedings","volume":"410 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modular and Offsite Construction (MOC) Summit Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/mocs261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Offsite construction is considered as a possible solution for addressing time, quality and cost concerns associated with traditional construction method. Successful implementation of these methods on a particular project requires systematic analysis and early decision making based on specific factors of the project. There is a lack of an efficient systematic approach that can match the changing needs, deal with the growing complexity of building projects and take into consideration recently developed innovations, technologies and regulations. The objective of this study is the development of an early-phase decision tool to support construction project teams in selecting construction methods. This paper proposes a multi-level decision framework. The first level conducts a feasibility study and evaluates the applicability of offsite construction. The second level proposes an integrated approach for the decision-making problem that combines the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE). The combination of both approaches enables a careful evaluation of different construction methods and scenarios for the same project. A computerized tool is developed and tested on a case study to help a project team in the decision-making process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
施工方法选择决策工具的开发:非现场施工的选择与优化
非现场施工被认为是解决与传统施工方法相关的时间、质量和成本问题的可能解决方案。这些方法在特定项目上的成功实施需要基于项目的具体因素进行系统分析和早期决策。缺乏一种有效的系统方法来满足不断变化的需求,处理日益复杂的建筑项目,并考虑到最近开发的创新、技术和法规。本研究的目的是开发一个早期阶段的决策工具,以支持建设项目团队选择施工方法。本文提出了一个多层次的决策框架。第一级进行可行性研究,评价非现场施工的适用性。第二层提出了一种结合层次分析法(AHP)和富集评价偏好排序组织法(PROMETHEE)的综合决策方法。这两种方法的结合能够对同一项目的不同施工方法和场景进行仔细的评估。一个计算机化的工具被开发和测试在一个案例研究中,以帮助项目团队在决策过程中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
VDC management in the industrialization process using prefabricated reinforcement cages. Case Study: Ovalo Monitor Bridge Keyword identification framework for speech communication on construction sites Offsite Construction education adoption in Civil Engineering undergraduate curriculum: analysis and proposal Layout modelling of the built environment for autonomous mobile robots using Building Information Modelling (BIM) and simulation An holistic approach to product evaluation and selection in industrialised building: Benchmarking of long span, low carbon floor systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1